GovChime
AWARDPOSmall business

Po EP11H000595BLANCO, EDGAR E

Overview

Award facts

Period of performance
Jul 26, 2011 to May 22, 2011
Ended
Modifications
1
Latest action Jul 26, 2011
Contract type
Po
PIID EP11H000595

Description of requirement

PEER REV SHIPPER TOOL: BLANCO THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS, THE SMARTWAY SHIPPER PARTNER MODELING TOOL, ALONG WITH ITS TECHNICAL DOCUMENT AND USER GUIDE, REQUIRES A PEER REVIEW. THIS TOOL IS AN UPDATED AND SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR SMARTWAY SHIPPER PARTNERS TO CALCULATE THEIR EFFICIENCY PERFORMANCE AND THEIR EMISSION REDUCTIONS. WE WOULD LIKE A THOROUGH REVIEW OF THE TECHNICAL CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENT, INCLUDING SUCH THINGS AS THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE UNDERLYING DATA AND DATA REQUESTED FROM PARTNERS, AND THE EFFICACY OF THE METHODOLOGIES TO HIGHLIGHT SHIPPER EFFICIENCY. NO INDEPENDENT DATA ANALYSIS IS NECESSARY. IN MAKING COMMENTS, WE ASK THAT THE REVIEWER DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CLEARLY DEFINED IMPROVEMENTS THAT CAN BE READILY MADE BASED ON DATA REASONABLY AVAILABLE TO EPA, AND THE SHIPPER PARTNERS USING THE TOOL, AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE MORE EXPLORATORY OR DEPENDENT UPON DATA NOT READILY AVAILABLE TO EPA. THE COMMENTS SHOULD BE SUFFICIENTLY DETAILED TO ALLOW A THOROUGH UNDERSTANDING BY EPA OR OTHER PARTIES FAMILIAR WITH THE SUBJECT MATTER. THE REVIEW SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM THE CHARGE LETTER IS ADDRESSED. THE REVIEWER COMMENTS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH A COVER LETTER THAT STATES THE REVIEWER S NAME, THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE REVIEWER S ORGANIZATION, WHAT MATERIAL WAS RECEIVED, A SUMMARY OF THE REVIEWER S EXPERTISE AND QUALIFICATIONS, AND A STATEMENT THAT THE REVIEWER HAS NO REAL OR PERCEIVED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. THE REVIEWER SHOULD E-MAIL THE LETTER AND COMMENTS TO ERIK HERZOG AT HERZOG.ERIK@EPA.GOV IN MS WORD OR PDF FORMAT WITHIN TWENTY BUSINESS DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE REVIEW PACKAGE. THE ELECTRONIC COPIES MAY BE SUBMITTED ON CD TO: ERIK HERZOG EPA-NVFEL/TRPD 2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 THE REVISED VERSION OF THE DOCUMENT WILL INCLUDE THE REVIEWER S COMMENTS AND OUR RESPONSES AS AN ATTACHMENT. WE ASK THAT THE REVIEWER NOT TO REVEAL ANY PEER REVIEW MATERIALS OR COMMENTS TO OUTSIDE PARTIES UNTIL EPA MAKES THEM PUBLIC.

Dates and value

Award date
Signed on May 2, 2011
Potential end of performance
May 21, 2011

Source: Federal Procurement Data System contract actions as published by SAM.gov and USAspending.gov; latest action recorded Jul 26, 2011. View on USAspending · Recipient on SAM.gov

Recipient

LocationCAMBRIDGE, MA
UEIT5CCRZKLHYG6
Business sizeSmall businessSize at award, per the contracting officer
Organization typeSole proprietorship
Parent companyBLANCO, EDGAR E

Business types and certifications

For-profit organization

Self-reported at the time of the action.

Agency and place

Awarding and funding

Awarded by
  1. Environmental Protection Agency
  2. LAB - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA CONTRACTING OFFICE
Funded by
  1. Environmental Protection Agency
  2. OFFICE FOR AIR AND RADIATION (OAR)

Place of performance

Place of performance
Ann Arbor, Michigan

Classification and competition

Classification

Product or service (PSC)
R499OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (service)

Competition

Extent competed
Not competed under SAPG
Reason not competed
SAP non-competitionSP2
Solicitation procedures
Simplified acquisitionSP1
Set-aside
No set-aside used
Contract pricing
Firm fixed priceJ
Offers received
1

Contract details

Subcontracting plan
Plan not requiredB
Major program
Peer review of smartway shipper partner tool
Government-furnished property
Transaction does not use GFE/GFPN
Bundled requirement
Not a bundled requirementD
Consolidated requirement
No
Undefinitized action (terms not final)
No
Performance-based service acquisition
No - service where PBA is not used.N

Transaction history

Modification history

Base award
May 2, 2011Base obligation at award: $1,000
Latest action
Jul 26, 2011 — Other administrative actionModification 1; administrative: no change in scope or value
Actions by type
  • Base award1
  • Other administrative action1
2 actions recorded, May 2, 2011 to Jul 26, 2011; each action counted once.

All contract data

All contract data

Every other field reported for this award, as of its latest reported action

Competition

Evaluation preference
No preference used
Simplified procedures for commercial items
No

Pricing and financing

Paid by purchase card
No

Socio-economic and policy

Recovered materials and sustainability
No clauses included and no sustainability includedC
EPA-designated product
Not requiredE

Place and origin

Domestic or foreign entity
U.S. owned businessA
Place of manufacture
Not a manufactured end productC

Structure

Award or IDV
Award
Award type
PoB
Awarding agency code
6800
Awarding sub-tier code
6800
Contracting office code
LNVCO0
Transactions recorded under this award key
2

Funding

Funding agency code
6800
Funding sub-tier code
6800
Funding office code
6820