Delivery order NNL14AB51TTHE BOEING COMPANY
Overview
Award facts
- Net obligations
- $5.00M
- $4,996,630of $8.33M potential value
- Period of performance
- Jul 22, 2014 to Oct 12, 2016
- Ended
- Modifications
- 17
- Latest action Aug 23, 2023
- Contract type
- Delivery order
- PIID NNL14AB51T
Description of requirement
IGF::OT::IGF TRUSS BRACED WING DESIGN AND TEST 1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:AS PART OF THE NASA FUNDAMENTAL AERONAUTICS PROGRAM, THE FIXED WING (FW) PROJECT IS PERFORMING RESEARCH INTO CONCEPTS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND TOOLS THAT WILL ENABLE DRAMATIC REDUCTIONS IN NOISE AND EMISSIONS, AND INCREASE THE PERFORMANCE (FUEL BURN AND REDUCED FIELD LENGTH) CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSONIC/TRANSONIC FIXED WING AIRCRAFT. THE FW PROJECT PURSUES A MULTI-GENERATIONAL APPROACH ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF TODAY BUT WITH AN EMPHASIS ON ESTABLISHING THE TECHNOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE CAPABILITIES NEEDED IN THE DECADES AHEAD. NASA SUBSONIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM LEVEL METRICS/GOALS ARE SHOWN BELOW IN TABLE 1. TABLE 1: NASA'S TECHNOLOGY GOALS FOR FUTURE SUBSONIC VEHICLES THIS EFFORT IS INTENDED TO IDENTIFY HIGH PAY-OFF RESEARCH THAT BUILDS ON THE EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND RESULTS OF THE TRUSS-BRACED WING (TBW) RESEARCH TO FURTHER REFINE AND ADVANCE THE TBW DESIGN CONFIGURATION AND VALIDATE THE LIFT/DRAG (L/D) AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE FOR ON AND OFF DESIGN CONDITIONS. THE TBW IS A TECHNOLOGY CONCEPT THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CHANGE THE DESIGN SPACE BY AFFECTING THE TRADES BETWEEN WING SWEEP, THICKNESS, SPEED, LIFT, AND WEIGHT. THESE TRADES CAN ENABLE VERY HIGH ASPECT RATIO, HIGH SPAN WINGS THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY TO AN OVERALL FUEL BURN REDUCTION GOAL OF -60% FOR TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT ENTERING INTO SERVICE IN THE 2030-35 TIMEFRAME, MARKET PERMITTING, RELATIVE TO 2005 BEST-IN-CLASS AIRCRAFT. CURRENT AERODYNAMIC PREDICTIONS FOR HIGH-SPEED AND LOW-SPEED AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE FOR HIGH SPAN TBWS ARE LIMITED BY A SHORTAGE OF RELEVANT EMPIRICAL DATA. THIS UNCERTAINTY, WHEN CYCLED THROUGH PERFORMANCE AND SIZING, RESULTS IN SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS IN AIRCRAFT WING AREA AND OTHER PARAMETERS IMPORTANT TO THE WING DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION. CRUISE DRAG UNCERTAINTY IS PRIMARILY CAUSED BY UNKNOWN STRUT-WING INTERFERENCE. EMPIRICAL DATA FOR A TRANSONIC STRUT-WING FAIRING IS NOT KNOWN TO EXIST. ADDITIONALLY, NACELLES ARE QUITE DIFFERENT THAN STRUTS AND THE ATTAINABLE LEVEL OF INTERFERENCE IS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. LOW-SPEED ANALYSES AND OPTIMIZATION OF SPANWISE FLAP DEFLECTION IS NECESSARY FOR AN ACCURATE PREDICTION OF TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE. THIS RESULTS IN UNCERTAINTY IN THE LOW-SPEED PERFORMANCE OF THE AIRCRAFT AS LIFT TO DRAG RATIO IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT AS MAXIMUM LIFT COEFFICIENT. EXISTING METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF LARGE ROLL AND PITCH RATES ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR HIGH ASPECT RATIO WINGS. ROLL DAMPING ESTIMATES BASED ON CONVENTIONAL WING ASPECT RATIOS MAY BE INSUFFICIENT TO ESTIMATE ROLL CONTROL POWER REQUIRED. EFFECTS OF AILERON AND/OR SPOILER DEFLECTION MUST BE CONSIDERED IN THE PERFORMANCE AND IN AEROELASTIC COUPLING TO THE SPANLOAD AND THUS TO THE ROLL DAMPING. DUE TO THE HIGH WING SPAN, ALLOWABLE ROLL ANGLE FOR TAKEOFF AND LANDING WILL BE LOWER THAN A CONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT, POSSIBLY AFFECTING CROSSWIND CONTROL. ANOTHER POTENTIAL CONCERN IS THE ROLL-YAW COUPLING. THE HIGH SPAN WING, ESPECIALLY AT HIGH ROLL RATES THAT CAN RESULT IN SEPARATED FLOW NEAR THE WING TIPS, CAN LEAD TO UNUSUALLY LARGE YAWING MOMENT COEFFICIENT DUE TO ROLL RATE DERIVATIVE (I.E., CNP VALUES) VALUES WHICH MAY AFFECT VERTICAL TAIL SIZING BEYOND THE NORMAL TRIM, ENGINE-OUT, AND DIRECTIONAL STABILITY CRITERIA. FOR THE PITCH AXIS, UNDERSTANDING CHANGES IN BASIC WING+BODY STABILITY LEVELS IN BOTH THE CRUISE AND IN THE HIGH-LIFT CONFIGURATIONS IS ALSO ESSENTIAL. IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THESE UNCERTAINTIES, HIGHER FIDELITY AERODYNAMIC DATA AT OFF-DESIGN CONDITIONS ARE NEEDED TO AUGMENT AND IMPROVE THE STRUCTURES, LOADS, AND STABILITY AND CONTROL ANALYSES IN ADDITION TO THE PRIMARY ON-DESIGN CRUISE DRAG (L/D) FOR THE TBW CONFIGURATION. 2.0 SCOPE, OBJECTIVE(S), APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS, AND ACRONYMS: 2.1 SCOPE: THE SCOPE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO REFINE THE DESIGN OF A TRANSONIC TBW AIRCRAFT WITH HIGH-FIDELITY TOOLS, AND ANY R
Dates and value
- Award date
- Signed on Jul 22, 2014
- Potential end of performance
- Oct 11, 2016
- Current value
- $4,996,974Base and exercised options
- Potential value (if all options are exercised)
- $8,328,362
- Parent contract vehicle
- NNL10AA05B (IDC, multiple award) — 39 orders recorded under it
Obligations by fiscal year of action
- FY2023: -$344 (de-obligation)
- FY2017: $2,096
- FY2016: $913,043
- FY2015: $2,181,835
- FY2014: $1,900,000
Total across 5 fiscal years: $4,996,630
Net de-obligation in that fiscal year (obligations withdrawn).
Source: Federal Procurement Data System contract actions as published by SAM.gov and USAspending.gov; latest action recorded Aug 23, 2023. View on USAspending · Recipient on SAM.gov
Recipient
Business types and certifications
Self-reported at the time of the action.
Agency and place
Awarding and funding
- Awarded by
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
- Funded by
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
- Funded from
- Aeronautics (DIRECT)Program activities080-0126Federal accounts (agency financial reports)
Place of performance
- Place of performance
- Huntington Beach, Orange County, California 92647-2048
- Congressional district (place of performance)
- CA-47As reported at the time of the action
Classification and competition
Classification
- Product or service (PSC)
- AR11SPACE R&D SERVICES; SPACE FLIGHT, RESEARCH AND SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES; BASIC RESEARCH (research and development)
Competition
- Extent competed
- Full and open competitionA
- Solicitation procedures
- Subject to multiple award fair opportunityMAFO
- Set-aside
- No set-aside used
- Contract pricing
- Cost plus fixed feeU
- Offers received
- 1
Contract details
- Major program
- Structures, materials, aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics, and acoustics for aerospace vehicles ~ smaa
- Commercial procedures
- Commercial products/services procedures not usedD
- Government-furnished property
- Transaction does not use GFE/GFPN
- Bundled requirement
- Not a bundled requirementD
- Consolidated requirement
- No
- Undefinitized action (terms not final)
- No
- Multi-year contract
- Yes
- Performance-based service acquisition
- Yes - service where PBA is used.Y
Transaction history
Modification history
- Base award
- Jul 22, 2014Base obligation at award: $1,235,000
- Latest action
- Aug 23, 2023 — Supplemental agreement (within scope)Modification 17; obligation change -$344
- Latest substantive action
- Aug 23, 2023 — Supplemental agreement (within scope)Modification 17; obligation change -$344
- Latest funding action
- Aug 26, 2016 — Funding onlyModification 14; obligation change +$53,301; funding only: changes obligations, not scope
- Actions by type
- Base award1
- Supplemental agreement (within scope)13
- Funding only4
All contract data
All contract data
Every other field reported for this award, as of its latest reported action
Competition
- Evaluation preference
- No preference used
- Local area set-aside
- No
- Simplified procedures for commercial items
- No
- A-76 (FAIR Act) action
- No
Pricing and financing
- Paid by purchase card
- No
Socio-economic and policy
- Inherently governmental functions
- Other functionsOT
- Recovered materials and sustainability
- No clauses included and no sustainability includedC
- EPA-designated product
- Not requiredE
- Clinger-Cohen Act planning (IT)
- No
Place and origin
- Domestic or foreign entity
- U.S. owned businessA
- Country of product or service origin
- United statesUSA
- Place of manufacture
- Not a manufactured end productC
Structure
- Award or IDV
- Award
- Award type
- Delivery orderC
- Parent vehicle type
- IDCB
- Parent vehicle: multiple or single award
- Multiple awardM
- Parent vehicle agency
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration8000
- Awarding agency code
- 8000
- Awarding sub-tier code
- 8000
- Contracting office code
- 80LARC
- Transactions recorded under this award key
- 18
Funding
- Funding agency code
- 8000
- Funding sub-tier code
- 8000
- Funding office code
- 80LARC
- Treasury accounts
- 080-2017/2018-0126-000
- Object classes
- 25.5: Research and development contracts
- Disaster or emergency funding (DEFC)
- Q: Not Designated Nonemergency/Emergency/Disaster/Wildfire Suppression