GovChime
AWARDDELIVERY ORDEROther than small business

Delivery order NNL14AB51TTHE BOEING COMPANY

Overview

Award facts

Net obligations
$5.00M
$4,996,630of $8.33M potential value
Period of performance
Jul 22, 2014 to Oct 12, 2016
Ended
Modifications
17
Latest action Aug 23, 2023
Contract type
Delivery order
PIID NNL14AB51T

Description of requirement

IGF::OT::IGF TRUSS BRACED WING DESIGN AND TEST 1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:AS PART OF THE NASA FUNDAMENTAL AERONAUTICS PROGRAM, THE FIXED WING (FW) PROJECT IS PERFORMING RESEARCH INTO CONCEPTS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND TOOLS THAT WILL ENABLE DRAMATIC REDUCTIONS IN NOISE AND EMISSIONS, AND INCREASE THE PERFORMANCE (FUEL BURN AND REDUCED FIELD LENGTH) CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSONIC/TRANSONIC FIXED WING AIRCRAFT. THE FW PROJECT PURSUES A MULTI-GENERATIONAL APPROACH ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF TODAY BUT WITH AN EMPHASIS ON ESTABLISHING THE TECHNOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE CAPABILITIES NEEDED IN THE DECADES AHEAD. NASA SUBSONIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM LEVEL METRICS/GOALS ARE SHOWN BELOW IN TABLE 1. TABLE 1: NASA'S TECHNOLOGY GOALS FOR FUTURE SUBSONIC VEHICLES THIS EFFORT IS INTENDED TO IDENTIFY HIGH PAY-OFF RESEARCH THAT BUILDS ON THE EXISTING KNOWLEDGE AND RESULTS OF THE TRUSS-BRACED WING (TBW) RESEARCH TO FURTHER REFINE AND ADVANCE THE TBW DESIGN CONFIGURATION AND VALIDATE THE LIFT/DRAG (L/D) AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE FOR ON AND OFF DESIGN CONDITIONS. THE TBW IS A TECHNOLOGY CONCEPT THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CHANGE THE DESIGN SPACE BY AFFECTING THE TRADES BETWEEN WING SWEEP, THICKNESS, SPEED, LIFT, AND WEIGHT. THESE TRADES CAN ENABLE VERY HIGH ASPECT RATIO, HIGH SPAN WINGS THAT MAY CONTRIBUTE SIGNIFICANTLY TO AN OVERALL FUEL BURN REDUCTION GOAL OF -60% FOR TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT ENTERING INTO SERVICE IN THE 2030-35 TIMEFRAME, MARKET PERMITTING, RELATIVE TO 2005 BEST-IN-CLASS AIRCRAFT. CURRENT AERODYNAMIC PREDICTIONS FOR HIGH-SPEED AND LOW-SPEED AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE FOR HIGH SPAN TBWS ARE LIMITED BY A SHORTAGE OF RELEVANT EMPIRICAL DATA. THIS UNCERTAINTY, WHEN CYCLED THROUGH PERFORMANCE AND SIZING, RESULTS IN SIGNIFICANT VARIATIONS IN AIRCRAFT WING AREA AND OTHER PARAMETERS IMPORTANT TO THE WING DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION. CRUISE DRAG UNCERTAINTY IS PRIMARILY CAUSED BY UNKNOWN STRUT-WING INTERFERENCE. EMPIRICAL DATA FOR A TRANSONIC STRUT-WING FAIRING IS NOT KNOWN TO EXIST. ADDITIONALLY, NACELLES ARE QUITE DIFFERENT THAN STRUTS AND THE ATTAINABLE LEVEL OF INTERFERENCE IS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN. LOW-SPEED ANALYSES AND OPTIMIZATION OF SPANWISE FLAP DEFLECTION IS NECESSARY FOR AN ACCURATE PREDICTION OF TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE. THIS RESULTS IN UNCERTAINTY IN THE LOW-SPEED PERFORMANCE OF THE AIRCRAFT AS LIFT TO DRAG RATIO IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT AS MAXIMUM LIFT COEFFICIENT. EXISTING METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF LARGE ROLL AND PITCH RATES ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR HIGH ASPECT RATIO WINGS. ROLL DAMPING ESTIMATES BASED ON CONVENTIONAL WING ASPECT RATIOS MAY BE INSUFFICIENT TO ESTIMATE ROLL CONTROL POWER REQUIRED. EFFECTS OF AILERON AND/OR SPOILER DEFLECTION MUST BE CONSIDERED IN THE PERFORMANCE AND IN AEROELASTIC COUPLING TO THE SPANLOAD AND THUS TO THE ROLL DAMPING. DUE TO THE HIGH WING SPAN, ALLOWABLE ROLL ANGLE FOR TAKEOFF AND LANDING WILL BE LOWER THAN A CONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT, POSSIBLY AFFECTING CROSSWIND CONTROL. ANOTHER POTENTIAL CONCERN IS THE ROLL-YAW COUPLING. THE HIGH SPAN WING, ESPECIALLY AT HIGH ROLL RATES THAT CAN RESULT IN SEPARATED FLOW NEAR THE WING TIPS, CAN LEAD TO UNUSUALLY LARGE YAWING MOMENT COEFFICIENT DUE TO ROLL RATE DERIVATIVE (I.E., CNP VALUES) VALUES WHICH MAY AFFECT VERTICAL TAIL SIZING BEYOND THE NORMAL TRIM, ENGINE-OUT, AND DIRECTIONAL STABILITY CRITERIA. FOR THE PITCH AXIS, UNDERSTANDING CHANGES IN BASIC WING+BODY STABILITY LEVELS IN BOTH THE CRUISE AND IN THE HIGH-LIFT CONFIGURATIONS IS ALSO ESSENTIAL. IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THESE UNCERTAINTIES, HIGHER FIDELITY AERODYNAMIC DATA AT OFF-DESIGN CONDITIONS ARE NEEDED TO AUGMENT AND IMPROVE THE STRUCTURES, LOADS, AND STABILITY AND CONTROL ANALYSES IN ADDITION TO THE PRIMARY ON-DESIGN CRUISE DRAG (L/D) FOR THE TBW CONFIGURATION. 2.0 SCOPE, OBJECTIVE(S), APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS, AND ACRONYMS: 2.1 SCOPE: THE SCOPE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO REFINE THE DESIGN OF A TRANSONIC TBW AIRCRAFT WITH HIGH-FIDELITY TOOLS, AND ANY R

Dates and value

Award date
Signed on Jul 22, 2014
Potential end of performance
Oct 11, 2016
Current value
$4,996,974Base and exercised options
Potential value (if all options are exercised)
$8,328,362
Parent contract vehicle
NNL10AA05B (IDC, multiple award) — 39 orders recorded under it

Obligations by fiscal year of action

  • FY2023: -$344 (de-obligation)
  • FY2017: $2,096
  • FY2016: $913,043
  • FY2015: $2,181,835
  • FY2014: $1,900,000

Total across 5 fiscal years: $4,996,630

Net de-obligation in that fiscal year (obligations withdrawn).

Source: Federal Procurement Data System contract actions as published by SAM.gov and USAspending.gov; latest action recorded Aug 23, 2023. View on USAspending · Recipient on SAM.gov

Recipient

LocationHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
UEIU5BBKY1S5GF6
CAGE code4JTK8
Business sizeOther than small businessSize at award, per the contracting officer
Organization typeCorporate not tax exempt
Parent companyTHE BOEING COMPANY

Business types and certifications

For-profit organizationCorporation (not tax-exempt)Manufacturer of goods

Self-reported at the time of the action.

Agency and place

Awarding and funding

Awarded by
  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
Funded by
  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
Funded from
Aeronautics (DIRECT)Program activities080-0126Federal accounts (agency financial reports)

Place of performance

Place of performance
Huntington Beach, Orange County, California 92647-2048
Congressional district (place of performance)
CA-47As reported at the time of the action

Classification and competition

Classification

Product or service (PSC)
AR11SPACE R&D SERVICES; SPACE FLIGHT, RESEARCH AND SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES; BASIC RESEARCH (research and development)

Competition

Extent competed
Full and open competitionA
Solicitation procedures
Subject to multiple award fair opportunityMAFO
Set-aside
No set-aside used
Contract pricing
Cost plus fixed feeU
Offers received
1

Contract details

Major program
Structures, materials, aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics, and acoustics for aerospace vehicles ~ smaa
Commercial procedures
Commercial products/services procedures not usedD
Government-furnished property
Transaction does not use GFE/GFPN
Bundled requirement
Not a bundled requirementD
Consolidated requirement
No
Undefinitized action (terms not final)
No
Multi-year contract
Yes
Performance-based service acquisition
Yes - service where PBA is used.Y

Transaction history

Modification history

Base award
Jul 22, 2014Base obligation at award: $1,235,000
Latest action
Aug 23, 2023 — Supplemental agreement (within scope)Modification 17; obligation change -$344
Latest substantive action
Aug 23, 2023 — Supplemental agreement (within scope)Modification 17; obligation change -$344
Latest funding action
Aug 26, 2016 — Funding onlyModification 14; obligation change +$53,301; funding only: changes obligations, not scope
Actions by type
  • Base award1
  • Supplemental agreement (within scope)13
  • Funding only4
18 actions recorded, Jul 22, 2014 to Aug 23, 2023; each action counted once.

All contract data

All contract data

Every other field reported for this award, as of its latest reported action

Competition

Evaluation preference
No preference used
Local area set-aside
No
Simplified procedures for commercial items
No
A-76 (FAIR Act) action
No

Pricing and financing

Paid by purchase card
No

Socio-economic and policy

Inherently governmental functions
Other functionsOT
Recovered materials and sustainability
No clauses included and no sustainability includedC
EPA-designated product
Not requiredE
Clinger-Cohen Act planning (IT)
No

Place and origin

Domestic or foreign entity
U.S. owned businessA
Country of product or service origin
United statesUSA
Place of manufacture
Not a manufactured end productC

Structure

Award or IDV
Award
Award type
Delivery orderC
Parent vehicle type
IDCB
Parent vehicle: multiple or single award
Multiple awardM
Parent vehicle agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration8000
Awarding agency code
8000
Awarding sub-tier code
8000
Contracting office code
80LARC
Transactions recorded under this award key
18

Funding

Funding agency code
8000
Funding sub-tier code
8000
Funding office code
80LARC
Treasury accounts
  • 080-2017/2018-0126-000
Object classes
  • 25.5: Research and development contracts
Disaster or emergency funding (DEFC)
  • Q: Not Designated Nonemergency/Emergency/Disaster/Wildfire Suppression