GovChime
AWARDDELIVERY ORDEROther than small business

Delivery order NNL15AB47TTHE BOEING COMPANY

Overview

Award facts

Net obligations
$6.29M
$6,291,684of $6.33M potential value
Outlays (paid to date)
$104.89K
$104.89K paid of $6.29M obligated$104,888
Period of performance
May 21, 2015 to Oct 12, 2016
Ended
Modifications
7
Latest action Aug 15, 2023
Contract type
Delivery order
PIID NNL15AB47T

Contract value is the most the government could spend; obligations are what it has legally committed; outlays are what it has actually paid.

Description of requirement

IGF::OT::IGF SMAAART (SMART MODEL FOR ATMOSPHERIC AND ASTRONOMICAL RADIANCE AND TRANSMITTANCE) TASK ORDER TITLED ADVANCED COMPSITES PROJECT (ACP)FOR CERTIFICATION TIMELINE REDUCTION . 1.0 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: THE NASA ADVANCED COMPOSITES PROJECT (ACP) IS FOCUSED ON REDUCING THE TIMELINE FOR DEVELOPING AND CERTIFYING STATE-OF-THE-ART COMPOSITE STRUCTURES BY 30 PERCENT IN AN EFFORT TO RETAIN AMERICAS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE GLOBAL AEROSPACE INDUSTRY. IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THIS AGGRESSIVE AND FAR REACHING GOAL, NASA HAS WORKED TO SET UP A PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP KNOWN AS THE ADVANCED COMPOSITES CONSORTIUM (ACC). THE CONSORTIUM CONSISTS OF NASA, THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA), BOEING, GENERAL ELECTRIC, LOCKHEED MARTIN, NORTHROP GRUMMAN, AND UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. THE ADVANCED COMPOSITES PROJECT IS DIVIDED INTO TWO PHASES. PHASE I IS INVESTIGATING A WIDE RANGE OF HIGH PAYOFF TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES IDENTIFIED BY THE ACC MEMBERS. PHASE II WILL MATURE AND VALIDATE THE TECHNOLOGIES SHOWN TO HAVE THE MOST IMPACT DURING THE PHASE I INVESTIGATION. THE WORK DEFINED IN THIS STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) REPRESENTS A PORTION OF THE ACP PHASE I ACTIVITIES THAT IS NOT INTENDED INCLUDE LIMITED RIGHTS DATA OR RESTRICTED RIGHTS SOFTWARE AS DEFINED UNDER FAR 52.227-14 (RIGHTS IN DATA GENERAL), AS MODIFIED BY NFS 1852.227-14. THESE ACTIVITIES ARE LIMITED TO: ASSESSING THE CURRENT STATE OF PRACTICE, IDENTIFYING TECHNOLOGY GAPS, FABRICATING COUPONS AND NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (NDE) STANDARDS, AND EVALUATING MANUFACTURING PROCESSES AND SIMULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO DEVELOP A REPRESENTATIVE DEVELOPMENT TO CERTIFICATION TIMELINE MODEL TO QUANTIFY THE TIMELINE REDUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH EACH OF THE TOOLS AND METHODS DEVELOPED OR MATURED UNDER THE ACP. NASA WILL USE THE DEVELOPMENT TO CERTIFICATION TIMELINE MODEL TO: 1) MEASURE PROGRESS TOWARD THE OVERALL ACP GOAL OF REDUCING THE TIMELINE BY 30%, 2) SELECT THE MOST PROMISING TOOLS AND METHODOLOGIES TO FURTHER ADVANCE IN PHASE II OF THE ACP, AND 3) DETERMINE THE FINAL TIMELINE REDUCTION ACHIEVED AT THE END OF THE 5-YEAR PROJECT. SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACP GOAL WILL SERVE TO BRING PRODUCTS TO THE AEROSPACE MARKET SOONER AND PROVIDE IMPROVED CHARACTERIZATION OF MAJOR COMPOSITE COMPONENTS TO ENHANCE SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE. 2.0 SCOPE, OBJECTIVES, AND DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND ACRONYMS:2.1SCOPE:THE SCOPE OF THIS TASK ORDER IS TO PERFORM STATE OF THE ART ASSESSMENTS, PLAN DEVELOPMENTS, FABRICATE COUPON AND PANEL TEST SPECIMENS, AND PERFORM THE INITIAL TESTING AND DATA COLLECTION NECESSARY TO SUPPORT FUTURE ADVANCED COMPOSITE PROJECT ACTIVITIES CURRENTLY PLANNED FOR THE ADVANCED COMPOSITES CONSORTIUM. 2.2 OBJECTIVES:THE OBJECTIVES OF THIS TASK ORDER ARE:A)DEVELOPING A DEVELOPMENT TO CERTIFICATION TIMELINE MODEL FOR ASSESSING THE TIMELINE REDUCTION POTENTIAL OF VARIOUS TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPED UNDER THE ACP.B)OBTAINING MATERIAL PROPERTY INPUT DATA AND DEVELOPING VALIDATION PLANS FOR THE MOST PROMISING PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS TOOLS APPROPRIATE FOR SIZING AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES. C)OBTAINING MATERIAL PROPERTY INPUT DATA AND DEVELOPING VALIDATION PLANS FOR THE MOST PROMISING PROGRESSIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS TOOLS APPROPRIATE FOR SIZING JET ENGINE FAN CONTAINMENT AND FUSELAGE SHIELDING STRUCTURES. D)EVALUATING THE MOST PROMISING RAPID DESIGN TOOLS, DEVELOPING VALIDATION PLANS, AND ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR ADVANCING RAPID DESIGN TOOLS. E)EVALUATING THE NON-DESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (NDE) INDUSTRY STATE OF PRACTICE AND DEVELOPING NDE STANDARDS COUPONS FOR EVALUATING ADVANCED NDE TECHNIQUES. F)EVALUATING THE ACCURACY AND CAPABILITY OF CURRENTLY AVAILABLE AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT (AFP) SIMULATION SOFTWARE TO ASSESS HOW IT CAN BE INCORPORATED INTO A FULL DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURING SOFTWARE SUITE. G) CHARACTERIZING THE EFFECTS OF AFP DEFECTS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND THE ASSOCIATED MATERIAL PROPERTY REDUCTION.

Dates and value

Award date
Signed on May 21, 2015
Potential end of performance
Oct 11, 2016
Current value
$6,331,686Base and exercised options
Potential value (if all options are exercised)
$6,331,686
Parent contract vehicle
NNL10AA05B (IDC, multiple award) — 39 orders recorded under it

Obligations by fiscal year of action

  • FY2023: $104,888
  • FY2021: -$4,786 (de-obligation)
  • FY2017: -$140,104 (de-obligation)
  • FY2015: $6,331,686

Total across 4 fiscal years: $6,291,684

Net de-obligation in that fiscal year (obligations withdrawn).

Source: Federal Procurement Data System contract actions as published by SAM.gov and USAspending.gov; latest action recorded Aug 15, 2023. View on USAspending · Recipient on SAM.gov

Recipient

LocationHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
UEIU5BBKY1S5GF6
CAGE code4JTK8
Business sizeOther than small businessSize at award, per the contracting officer
Organization typeCorporate not tax exempt
Parent companyTHE BOEING COMPANY

Business types and certifications

For-profit organizationCorporation (not tax-exempt)Manufacturer of goods

Self-reported at the time of the action.

Agency and place

Awarding and funding

Awarded by
  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
Funded by
  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER
Funded from
Aeronautics (DIRECT)Program activities080-0126Federal accounts (agency financial reports)

Place of performance

Place of performance
Huntington Beach, Orange County, California 92647-2048
Congressional district (place of performance)
CA-47As reported at the time of the action

Classification and competition

Classification

Product or service (PSC)
AR11SPACE R&D SERVICES; SPACE FLIGHT, RESEARCH AND SUPPORTING ACTIVITIES; BASIC RESEARCH (research and development)

Competition

Extent competed
Full and open competitionA
Solicitation procedures
Subject to multiple award fair opportunityMAFO
Set-aside
No set-aside used
Contract pricing
Cost plus fixed feeU
Offers received
1

Contract details

Major program
Structures, materials, aerodynamics, aerothermodynamics, and acoustics for aerospace vehicles ~ smaa
Commercial procedures
Commercial products/services procedures not usedD
Government-furnished property
Transaction does not use GFE/GFPN
Bundled requirement
Not a bundled requirementD
Consolidated requirement
No
Undefinitized action (terms not final)
No
Multi-year contract
Yes
Performance-based service acquisition
Yes - service where PBA is used.Y

Transaction history

Modification history

Base award
May 21, 2015Base obligation at award: $6,251,831
Latest action
Aug 15, 2023 — Other administrative actionModification P00007; administrative: no change in scope or value
Latest substantive action
Jun 22, 2021 — Supplemental agreement (within scope)Modification P00005; obligation change -$4,786
Latest funding action
Jun 23, 2023 — Funding onlyModification P00006; obligation change +$104,888; funding only: changes obligations, not scope
Actions by type
  • Base award1
  • Supplemental agreement (within scope)5
  • Funding only1
  • Other administrative action1
8 actions recorded, May 21, 2015 to Aug 15, 2023; each action counted once.

All contract data

All contract data

Every other field reported for this award, as of its latest reported action

Competition

Evaluation preference
No preference used
Local area set-aside
No
Simplified procedures for commercial items
No
A-76 (FAIR Act) action
No

Pricing and financing

Paid by purchase card
No

Socio-economic and policy

Inherently governmental functions
Other functionsOT
Recovered materials and sustainability
No clauses included and no sustainability includedC
EPA-designated product
Not requiredE
Clinger-Cohen Act planning (IT)
No

Place and origin

Domestic or foreign entity
U.S. owned businessA
Country of product or service origin
United statesUSA
Place of manufacture
Not a manufactured end productC

Structure

Award or IDV
Award
Award type
Delivery orderC
Parent vehicle type
IDCB
Parent vehicle: multiple or single award
Multiple awardM
Parent vehicle agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration8000
Awarding agency code
8000
Awarding sub-tier code
8000
Contracting office code
80LARC
Transactions recorded under this award key
8

Funding

Funding agency code
8000
Funding sub-tier code
8000
Funding office code
80LARC
Treasury accounts
  • 080-2015/2016-0126-000
  • 080-2023/2024-0126-000
Object classes
  • 25.5: Research and development contracts
Disaster or emergency funding (DEFC)
  • Q: Not Designated Nonemergency/Emergency/Disaster/Wildfire Suppression