Next Generation Tactical Radio (NGTR)
Active, responses due . Full description on SAM.gov.
Description
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), PMA-209, located at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland, is seeking information from potential sources regarding a modular Software Defined Radio (SDR) for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft, designated the Next Generation Tactical Radio (NGTR).
The NGTR is intended to support voice and data waveforms in the Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) bands, with operational capability extending up to 6 GHz. It will incorporate a modular High Assurance Device (HAD) to meet National Security Agency (NSA) cryptographic and Security Evaluation Requirements Document (SERD) requirements. Additionally, the NGTR is designed to serve as a form, fit, and function backwards-compatible replacement for aircraft currently equipped with the ARC-210 Generation 5 and Generation 6 radios.
This Market Research tool is being used to identify potential and eligible firms, of all sizes, prior to determining the method of acquisition and issuance of a solicitation. The results of the Request for Information (RFI) will be utilized to determine if any Small Business Set-Aside opportunities exist. Additionally, this RFI is being used to gather constructive information from industry to improve the RFP.
The following documents are attached to this RFI Notice:
-
- Attachment 1: NGTR RFI Performance Requirements - DRAFT
- Attachment 2: Program and Risk Feedback Matrix
The following dates are anticipated time frames associated with this requirement:
-
- Estimated Industry Day: 1st Quarter FY27
- Estimated Draft RFP Release: 3rd Quarter FY 27
- Estimated Final RFP Release: 4th Quarter FY 27
- Estimated Award Date: 2nd Quarter FY 28
- Target Fleet Delivery: Mid-2034 – Production-ready NGTR systems delivered to fleet locations for aircraft installation
Primary Place of Performance: Contractor facility and as needed at government test sites and government facilities for meetings with NAVAIR and NSA.
2.0 DISCLAIMER
THIS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SOLICITATION AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONSES IN ANY FORM ARE NOT OFFERS AND THE GOVERNMENT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT AS A RESULT OF THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. NO FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE TO PAY FOR PREPARATION OF RESPONSES TO THIS ANNOUNCEMENT. ANY INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY RESPONDENTS TO THIS REQUEST IS STRICTLY VOLUNTARY.
3.0 PROGRAM BACKGROUND
The NGTR system's goal is to develop a small form factor system compatible with existing and future U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft that will support:
- Communications waveforms in the VHF, UHF frequency bands with support for waveforms up to 6GHz. Waveforms defined in Attachment 1.
- A Modular, Open architecture to support rapid capability integration and obsolescence upgrades including a modular High Assurance Device (HAD) that supports NSA cryptographic and SERD requirements.
- Zero Trust System security meeting applicable Risk Management Framework (RMF) controls.
- Minimal integration impact and modification requirements for existing and future U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft platforms.
4.0 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND REQUIRED CAPABILITIES
The NGTR system is expected to meet the performance requirements defined in Attachment 1: “NGTR RFI Performance Requirements” - DRAFT.
The NGTR Contractor is expected to meet the following qualifications:
- Have secure military software defined radios with embedded NSA certified cryptography.
- Have experience in agile and modular development and testing, incorporating customer feedback throughout the process.
- Have the ability to obtain Top Secret security clearances for employees and facility within 12 months of contract award, including the ability to support development and test up to the Top Secret level.
- Have experience in developing and producing UHF and VHF RF radios supporting military and non-military communications waveforms.
- Has experience in Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE).
- Have expertise and experience in reducing total life cycle support costs and utilizing predictive maintenance strategies to streamline repair procedures and reduce maintenance downtime.
- Have experience establishing, maintaining, and documenting a proactive DMSMS (Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages) and obsolescence programs.
5.0 ELIGIBILITY
The applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this requirement is 334220 (Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing), with a Small Business Size Standard of 1,250 Employees.
The Product Service Code (PSC) is 5821, (Radio and Television Communication Equipment, Airborne).
Businesses of all sizes are encouraged to respond; however, each respondent must clearly identify their business size in their capabilities statement.
Note: FAR 52.219-14 Limitation on Subcontracting requires a small business prime on a Set-Aside to perform at least 50% of the cost of contract performance. Small business primes may now count “first tier subcontracted” work performed by similarly situated entities as if it were performed by the prime itself.
To assist in market research and determination of any applicable small business set-aside for this effort, small businesses interested in priming this effort and planning to use “similarly situated entities” to meet the Limitations on Subcontracting, are requested to identify:
- The name & CAGE Code of the specific firm(s) intending to partner/subcontract
- Their small business size status under the NAICS that as the prime, you would assign for their workshare.
6.0 SUBMISSION DETAILS
To ensure a fair, orderly, and efficient evaluation process, all interested parties must adhere to the following submission guidelines:
6.1 Logistics and Deadlines
- Response Date: All submissions must be received no later than 2:00 PM EST on 23 November 2026.
- Questions Deadline: Clarifying questions regarding this RFI must be submitted via email no later than 10 business days prior to the response date.
6.2 Submission Method and Point of Contact (POC)
- Delivery: Submissions must be sent via Electronic-mail (Email) to the Contract Specialist, Sham Keswani, at sham.v.keswani.civ@us.navy.mil.
- Subject Line Format: The email subject line must read: NGTR RFI Response - [Company Name].
- Inquiries: No phone calls will be accepted. All questions must be submitted via email to the Contract Specialist listed above.
6.3 Format and Structure Instructions
- Page Limit: Submissions must not exceed ten (10) pages total (excluding the Program and Risk Feedback Matrix in Section 7.0).
- Page Size & Margins: Standard 8.5 x 11-inch pages with 1-inch margins.
- Font: Times New Roman, font size of not less than 10 point.
- Document Type: Adobe PDF format.
- Classification: No classified information shall be submitted in response to this RFI.
6.4 Required Content
Your submission package must include the following structured sections:
- Cover Page / Company Profile: Company Name, Address, CAGE Code, DUNS/UEI, Business Size Status under NAICS 334220, and designated Points of Contact (POC) including names, phone numbers, and email addresses.
- Capabilities Statement: A detailed narrative addressing your ability to meet the special requirements and required capabilities outlined in Section 4.0.
- Program and Risk Feedback: Completed responses to the targeted questions and the structured feedback matrix outlined in Section 7.0.
6.5 Proprietary Data and Information Handling
All data received in response to this RFI that is marked or designated as corporate or proprietary will be fully protected from any release outside the Government. Any information or materials provided in response to this RFI Notice will not be returned. The Government is not committed nor obligated to pay for the information provided, and no basis for claims against the Government shall arise resulting from responses to this RFI Notice.
7.0 PROGRAM AND RISK FEEDBACK
The Government is actively seeking constructive industry feedback to refine the NGTR program structure, technical requirements, and acquisition strategy.
Industry Feedback Disclaimer: We actively encourage vendors to challenge our assumptions, highlight potential program risks, and suggest alternative approaches. Candid feedback regarding the feasibility of our timeline, scope, or technical requirements is highly valued and will not negatively impact your evaluation in any future procurement processes.
7.1 Targeted Feedback Questions
Please provide direct, concise answers to the following questions within your submission:
- Program Scope & Feasibility: Based on the draft performance requirements (Attachment 1), are there any requirements that you view as overly restrictive, technologically unfeasible, or drivers of unnecessary cost?
- Timeline Realism: Reviewing our anticipated milestones Final RFP in FY27, Award in FY28, and a target fleet delivery of production-ready systems by mid-2034), is this timeline realistic for a system of this complexity? Please address the timeline required for development, environmental testing, platform integration, and NSA cryptographic certification.
- Cryptographic & Security Integration: What are the primary technical and certification risks associated with integrating a modular High Assurance Device (HAD) to meet NSA cryptographic and SERD requirements within the proposed form factor?
- Obsolescence & DMSMS: What proactive strategies do you recommend the Government incorporate into the contract structure to best incentivize long-term DMSMS management and minimize life cycle support costs?
7.2 Program and Risk Feedback Matrix
Please utilize the attached structured template to document specific risks, scope concerns, or program improvements:
Overview
Award Overview
Possible prior contracts
Sign in to see possible prior contracts for this requirement (matched by agency, NAICS and place of performance; not confirmed).
Contacts
Contracting Officer
Primary Contact
Secondary Contact
Documents
Files (1)
- Download
NGTR Program Risk Feedback Matrix.docx
17 KBAdded in Presolicitation version 2Posted
Lifecycle
- 1Version 1Presolicitation
Next Generation Tactical Radio (NGTR)
- 2Version 2Presolicitation
Next Generation Tactical Radio (NGTR)
- 3Version 3PresolicitationCurrent
Next Generation Tactical Radio (NGTR)
Similar Opportunities
Title | Phase | Agency | NAICS | Set Aside | Posted | Deadline | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division (NSWC, IHD), intends to award a firm fixed price contract on a noncompetitive basis to Berkeley Varitronics Systems, Inc. – 255 Liberty St., Metuchen NJ 08840 USA to provide the following supply: Yorkie Pro cell phone detector This action is undertaken in accordance with FAR 13.106-1(b)(1) Soliciting from a single source, on the basis that the vendor is the only known source capable of meeting the government’s requirements The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for this requirement is 334220. The FSC code is 6350. The resulting contract will be a firm fixed price contract. Negotiation being conducted using other than full and open competition procedures pursuant to authority of 41 U.S.C 1901. This Notice of Intent is not a request for quotes. Interested parties may identify their interests and capability to respond to this requirement by November 10, 2026, at 10AM (EST). Any response to this notice must show clear and convincing evidence that competition would be advantageous to the Government. Information received will be considered solely for the purpose of determining whether or not to conduct a competitive procurement. The determination not to compete this proposed contract action is solely within the discretion of the Government. The Government will not be responsible for any costs incurred by responding to this notice. Responses to this electronic notice must be made by 10:00 a.m. EST on November 10, 2026. Interested vendors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM. Oral communications are not acceptable in response to this notice. Interested parties shall e-mail all statements, quotes, and capabilities to Shannon Wooten, via email: Shannon.cloud-wooten@navy.mil and must provide clear and concise documentation indicating a vendor's bona fide capability. | Special Notice | 334220 | No Set-Aside | 10/27/2026 | 11/10/2026 | Indian Head, MD | |
DISCLAIMER THIS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) IS FOR INFORMATIONAL AND PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS A MARKET RESEARCH TOOL BEING USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION (FAR) PART 10 TO IDENTIFY FIRMS POTENTIALLY CAPABLE OF PROVIDING THE CAPABILITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN AND TO INFORM POTENTIAL FUTURE ACQUISITION PLANNING. THIS RFI IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, INVITATION FOR BID, REQUEST FOR QUOTATION, SOLICITATION, OR COMMITMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT. RESPONSES IN ANY FORM ARE NOT OFFERS AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO FORM A BINDING CONTRACT. THE GOVERNMENT IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO AWARD A CONTRACT OR ISSUE A FUTURE SOLICITATION AS A RESULT OF THIS RFI. ANY QUANTITIES OR DELIVERY SCENARIOS REFERENCED IN THIS RFI ARE PROVIDED SOLELY TO SUPPORT MARKET RESEARCH AND CAPACITY PLANNING AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE A GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENT, ACQUISITION FORECAST, MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM PURCHASE QUANTITY, OR COMMITMENT TO PROCURE ANY QUANTITY. RESPONSE TO THIS RFI IS STRICTLY VOLUNTARY. THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT REIMBURSE RESPONDENTS FOR ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PREPARING OR SUBMITTING A RESPONSE, PROVIDING SUPPORTING INFORMATION, PARTICIPATING IN FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSIONS, OR PARTICIPATING IN ANY SUBSEQUENT MARKET RESEARCH ACTIVITY. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THIS RFI WILL NOT BE RETURNED. FAILURE TO RESPOND TO THIS RFI WILL NOT PRECLUDE A COMPANY FROM PARTICIPATING IN ANY FUTURE MARKET RESEARCH EFFORT, TECHNICAL DEMONSTRATION, OR COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION RELATED TO GROUP 1 AND GROUP 2 UAS TRAINING, MISSION PLANNING, MISSION REHEARSAL, SIMULATION, AND QUALIFICATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT OBLIGATED TO PROVIDE FEEDBACK OR COMMENTS REGARDING ANY RESPONSE. NO TELEPHONE RESPONSES WILL BE ACCEPTED. INTRODUCTION The Aircraft Project Management Office (AIR PMO), under the Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager Robotic Autonomous Systems (DRPM RAS), is conducting market research regarding commercially available and emerging Group 1 and Group 2 Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Training, Mission Planning, Mission Rehearsal, Simulation, and Qualification Management Systems. For market research and planning purposes, the Government is seeking information regarding industry’s ability to provide and support these capabilities at scale. Potential future demand could involve thousands of training devices, simulator stations, software licenses, or equivalent deployed units. However, no procurement quantity, acquisition strategy, or requirement has been established, and any quantities referenced in this RFI are illustrative planning assumptions only. The Government requests white papers from interested parties with commercially available or emerging capabilities. Responses will assist the Government in identifying potential solutions; understanding technical approaches, system maturity, interoperability, scalability, implementation considerations, and business models; refining capability objectives and potential requirements; and informing acquisition planning and potential procurement strategies. This RFI follows the Air PMO virtual Industry Day conducted on 03 September 2026. Participation in the Industry Day is not a prerequisite for responding to this RFI. Interested parties may respond regardless of whether they attended the event. This RFI is an independent Air PMO market research effort and is not associated with or conducted in support of the Drone Dominance Program. Respondents should address the capability areas and information requested in this RFI without assuming any relationship to that program’s requirements, acquisition approach, funding, schedule, or procurement quantities. BACKGROUND Simulation-based training has the potential to enhance operator proficiency, improve training availability, increase training throughput, reduce operational risk, and provide realistic Mission Planning and Mission Rehearsal capabilities for Group 1 and Group 2 UAS. These capabilities may enable operators to safely practice in realistic and challenging operational and threat environments, emergency procedures, and degraded system behaviors that may be impractical, unsafe, or cost-prohibitive to execute using live aircraft. Simulation-based training may also reduce operational impacts associated with range availability, airspace restrictions, spectrum congestion, weather delays, aircraft maintenance requirements, and logistical constraints while supporting standardized, repeatable, and scalable training across multiple UAS platforms. The Government seeks to understand current industry capabilities, technology maturity, innovative approaches, best practices, and limitations relevant to these objectives. MARKET RESEARCH PROCESS This RFI represents the white-paper phase of Air PMO's market research effort. The Government may use information received to support capability development, requirements refinement, acquisition planning, evaluation of commercially available and emerging solutions, and potential procurement strategies. Following review of submitted white papers, the Government may invite selected respondents to participate in follow-up discussions or technical demonstrations to further assess the maturity, suitability, and applicability of proposed solutions. Selection for, or participation in, a follow-up activity does not constitute a competitive range determination, source-selection decision, commitment to procure, or preference for any future acquisition. Any invitation and associated instructions will be issued separately. The Government may elect not to conduct follow-up activities and is not obligated to provide feedback to respondents. INFORMATION REQUESTED Respondents should provide a concise white paper describing how their solution addresses the capability areas in this RFI. Responses should identify current capabilities separately from planned, developmental, or partner-provided capabilities. At a minimum, the white paper should address the following: Company profile, business size and socioeconomic status, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), and primary point(s) of contact. Executive summary of the proposed solution and the operational or training problem it addresses. Description of the complete solution, including software, hardware, peripherals, hosting or deployment model, licensing, and any Government-furnished equipment or services required. A capability cross-reference identifying each applicable Capability Area of Interest as currently available, configurable, developmental, not available, or provided by a third party. For developmental capabilities, identify the anticipated availability date and key dependencies. Supported Group 1 and Group 2 UAS platforms, flight models, ground control stations, hand controllers, payloads, mission-planning tools, and training environments, including the approach and estimated effort to add new aircraft or configurations. Technical maturity and commercial availability, including Technology Readiness Level or equivalent maturity evidence, operational use, customer base, relevant contracts, and available test or performance data. System architecture, interfaces, data formats, application programming interfaces, standards, modularity, and approach to integration with Government or third-party systems. Training-management, instructor, evaluation, after-action review, records-management, and qualification-management functionality. Cybersecurity, identity and access management, data protection, software-update, cloud or on-premises deployment, and authority-to-operate status or experience, as applicable. NDAA and supply-chain compliance status, including identification of any noncompliant components, planned remediation, dependencies, or assumptions. Implementation approach, schedule, lead times, training and support model, sustainment, warranties, upgrades, and product roadmap. Production, licensing, integration, deployment, and delivery capacity, as applicable to the proposed solution. Identify the unit of measure or configuration used to describe capacity; current sustainable monthly capacity; the number of complete and operational units that could be delivered or deployed within the first 30 calendar days after receipt of an order; and the estimated time required to deliver or deploy a cumulative quantity of 2,000 units. If the respondent cannot currently support that quantity, describe the time, resources, facilities, workforce, suppliers, capital investment, Government actions, or other conditions required to achieve and sustain the necessary capacity. For solutions not delivered as individual hardware devices, provide equivalent information using the most appropriate unit of measure, such as simulator stations, training seats, software licenses, concurrent users, sites, or enterprise deployments. Rough-order-of-magnitude pricing or commercial pricing structure, including major cost drivers, licensing basis, nonrecurring integration costs, and relevant quantity or enterprise pricing assumptions. Pricing is requested solely for market research and is not a proposal or binding offer. Known limitations, risks, dependencies, and recommended Government actions or information needed to support implementation. Readiness and recommended scope for a potential technical demonstration, including the capabilities to be demonstrated; whether the demonstration would be live, virtual, or hybrid; required facilities, equipment, connectivity, Government-furnished information or equipment, data, cybersecurity or network considerations, safety considerations, estimated preparation time, and estimated demonstration duration. CAPABILITY AREAS OF INTEREST The Government is interested in understanding industry capabilities in the following areas. These areas are provided solely for market research and do not constitute final requirements or imply a future procurement strategy. Respondents are not required to address every area and should clearly identify the areas applicable to their solution. Training and Qualification Management Initial operator qualification training Refresher and sustainment training Instructor-led training Student performance tracking Student training records and qualification management Automated grading and evaluation After-action review and debrief capabilities Training syllabus management Unmanned Aircraft Simulation and Flight Fidelity Unmanned Aircraft-specific flight models Realistic flight characteristics and handling qualities Unmanned Aircraft performance modeling Payload effects on aircraft performance Environmental and weather effects Emergency procedure training Lost-link procedures Degraded system operations Mission Planning and Mission Rehearsal Mission planning functionality Mission rehearsal capability Route and waypoint planning Terrain analysis Obstacle analysis Airspace planning Real-world geographic mission rehearsal Operational environment replication Import and export of mission plans, geospatial data, and mapping products Terrain and Synthetic Environment Global terrain databases Satellite imagery integration Digital elevation models Urban environments Maritime environments Custom training area generation Area of Responsibility (AOR) development User-generated scenarios Instructor and Evaluation Capability Instructor Operator Station (IOS) Scenario creation and modification Student monitoring Real-time scenario control Scenario replay Instructor evaluation tools Scenario injection capabilities Contested and Tactical Environment Training GPS-denied operations GPS-degraded operations Electronic warfare effects Communications degradation Adverse weather operations Tactical mission scenarios Multi-aircraft operations System Integration and Interoperability Integration with operational hand controllers Integration with operational Ground Control Stations (GCS) Support for multiple aircraft types Open architecture solutions Future aircraft integration Government-configurable aircraft libraries Modular system design Compatibility with commercially available and Government-furnished simulation hardware, controllers, and peripherals WHITE PAPER FORMAT AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS White papers shall conform to the following format: File format: Searchable Adobe PDF. Do not submit ZIP files or password-protected files. Page size and margins: 8.5 x 11 inches with 1-inch margins on all sides. Font: Arial or Times New Roman, 11-point or larger. Tables and figure labels may use 9-point font or larger. Condensed fonts and newspaper-column formatting are not permitted. Length: no more than 30 pages, excluding the cover page, table of contents, acronym list, and appendices containing only product literature or supporting test data. File size: no more than 20 MB per response unless coordinated in advance with the Point of Contact. One response per company or team is preferred. Respondents proposing materially different solutions may submit separate white papers. Submission deadline: The white-paper submission deadline is concurrent with the RFI response date. Submission method: Email the white paper to FoSUAS_Simulator_and_Training_RFI@us.navy.mil and the Contracting Points of Contact identified in this notice. If a response cannot be transmitted by email because of file-size or security restrictions, contact the Points of Contact before the submission deadline to coordinate a Government-approved transfer method. Email subject line: "RFI White Paper - Group 1 and Group 2 UAS Training and Simulation - [Company Name]" The body of the submission email should identify the company name, white-paper title, primary point of contact, telephone number, email address, business size and socioeconomic status, CAGE code, and UEI. Do not submit classified information. All material provided in response to this RFI shall be UNCLASSIFIED. Respondents are responsible for accurately marking all data with applicable proprietary, data-rights, distribution, and export-control markings. Restrictive markings should be applied only to the specific portions requiring protection and not to the response in its entirety. The Government will protect properly marked information from unauthorized disclosure in accordance with applicable laws and regulations but cannot ensure the protection of information that is not clearly marked. QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RFI Questions Interested parties wishing to submit questions regarding this RFI shall use the RFI Question Submission Link provided as an attachment to this RFI on SAM.gov. Questions should be submitted sufficiently in advance of the RFI response date to allow the Government time to respond. The Government will make reasonable efforts to provide timely responses; however, the RFI response date will not be extended solely because a question remains unanswered. If a company is unable to access or submit questions using the RFI Question Submission Form due to technical difficulties, questions may be submitted by email to FoSUAS_Simulator_and_Training_RFI@us.navy.mil. Email question submissions shall include the following information: Company Name Point of Contact (POC) Name Point of Contact (POC) Title Point of Contact (POC) Email Address Point of Contact (POC) Telephone Number Question(s) Email question submissions shall include the following subject line: “Questions – RFI for Group 1 and Group 2 UAS Training and Simulation – [Company Name]” Questions shall not include proprietary, competition-sensitive, classified, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), export-controlled, or other restricted information, as questions and corresponding Government responses may be consolidated and published on SAM.gov. Telephone inquiries regarding this RFI will not be accepted. NDAA COMPLIANCE AND SMALL UAS REUSABLE ARCHITECTURE (SRA) AWARENESS Information obtained through this RFI may be used to inform future market research activities, acquisition planning, and procurement decisions. Respondents should identify the current compliance status of their proposed solutions with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, including, as applicable, NDAA FY2020 Section 848, NDAA FY2023 Section 817, NDAA FY2019 Section 889, and the American Security Drone Act of 2023 (FY2024 NDAA, Public Law 118-31, Division A, Title XVIII, Subtitle B, Section 1821). Respondents should also describe any planned pathway to achieve compliance and the associated schedule, risks, and dependencies. To support transparency and traceability of NDAA compliance, respondents may, at their discretion, leverage the Navy's Small UAS Reusable Architecture (SRA) framework to document system components, supply-chain attributes, and applicable security controls. The SRA provides Government-backed tools and self-assessment mechanisms that enable vendors to evaluate alignment with applicable DoD-approved benchmarks and facilitate review of compliance artifacts during market research activities. Additional information is available at https://sra.navair.navy.mil. The SRA website is Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) enabled and requires a Department of Defense Common Access Card (CAC) or DoD External Certificate Authority (ECA) certificate for access. Additional information, including instructions for obtaining an ECA certificate, is available at https://www.cyber.mil/eca. Accordingly, access to the SRA website may be limited for some respondents. Use of the SRA framework and associated tools is not required to respond to this RFI and is provided for awareness and informational purposes only. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION AND GOVERNMENT SUPPORT CONTRACTORS Government Support Contractors may assist with the receipt, handling, review, analysis, and administration of responses. These contractors have executed Non-Disclosure Agreements with the Government that prohibit unauthorized disclosure of proprietary information obtained through this market research effort. Respondents are responsible for clearly identifying and marking proprietary or competition-sensitive information in their white papers, attachments, and correspondence. The Government will protect properly marked information from unauthorized disclosure in accordance with applicable law and regulation. Respondents should not place restrictive legends on the entire response when only portions contain protected information. If a respondent requires a separate Non-Disclosure Agreement with Government Support Contractors, the respondent should submit the proposed agreement and instructions to the Points of Contact with its response. The Government does not guarantee that a separate agreement will be executed and may be unable to evaluate information that cannot be shared with authorized support contractors. Unless the respondent expressly states otherwise in its response, submission constitutes consent for authorized Government Support Contractors to access properly marked proprietary information for purposes of this market research effort. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Government may contact respondents independently for clarification or additional information. Information received may be used to refine market research, capability objectives, potential requirements, acquisition strategy, and planning documents. Respondents are responsible for monitoring SAM.gov for amendments, answers to questions, or follow-on information. Respondents that are foreign concerns, or U.S. concerns with foreign team members or partners, are responsible for compliance with all applicable export-control laws and regulations, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR). POINTS OF CONTACT NAVAIR Procurement Group: Contracting Officer- Diana Harritt diana.k.harritt.civ@us.navy.mil Contract Specialist – John Barr john.m.barr1.civ@us.navy.mil Contract Specialist - Mariah Williams - mariah.b.williams.civ@us.navy.mil RFI Email Inbox: FoSUAS_Simulator_and_Training_RFI@us.navy.mil | Market Research | 334220 | No Set-Aside | 10/23/2026 | 12/22/2026 | 0, MD | |
The Naval Air Systems Command, PMA-265 (Program Office for F/A-18 and EA-18G Aircraft), intends to award a firm-fixed price (FFP) delivery order against an existing sole source Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) N0001926G1002 to The Boeing Company in support Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) Audio Management System (AMS) Retrofit Recurring A-Kits for FY27 in support of the United States Navy (USN). This effort will procure 140 A-Kit Retrofit units to enable modernization of USN F/A-18 and EA-18G communications suite. This procurement supports hardware delivery only. The period of performance is anticipated to begin in August 2027 will be 12 months. Boeing is the designer, developer, manufacturer, and integrator of the F/A-18 aircraft in its various configurations; and as such, is the only known firm with the knowledge, experience, and technical expertise required to accomplish this effort. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS AND NO COMPETITIVE SOLICITATION WILL BE ISSUED. This synopsis is for informational purposes only. This acquisition is being pursued on a sole source basis under the authority permitting other than full and open competition is Title 10, U.S. Code 3204(a)(1), as implemented by Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.103-1, “Only one responsible source and no other supplies or series will satisfy agency requirements”. There is no commitment by the Government to issue a solicitation, make an award or awards, or be responsible for any money expended by interested parties before award of a contract for the effort described above. Information provided herein is subject to change and in no way binds the Government to solicit or award a contract. Subcontracting opportunities should be sought directly from The Boeing Company Small Business Liaison Officer, Taylor Beitler, taylor.beitler@boeing.com. | Combined Synopsis | 334220 | No Set-Aside | 10/08/2026 | 10/23/2026 | Saint Louis, MO | |
CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N761.17|P1Q|215-697-3972|peter.a.kobryn.civ@us.navy.mil| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| INSPECTION OF SUPPLIES--FIXED-PRICE (AUG 1996)|2||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|x|||||||| INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SUPPLIES|26|x||||||||||||x|||||||||||||| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and receiving report combo type|Source/Source|TBD|N00383|TBD|TBD|See Schedule|TBD|||TBD|||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|| MANDATORY USE OF WORKFLOW PRO (WFP) MOD ASSIST MODULE|1|| VALUE ENGINEERING (JUN 2020)|3|||| INTEGRITY OF UNIT PRICES (NOV 2021)|1|| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| WARRANTY OF SUPPLIES OF A NONCOMPLEX NATURE (JUN 2003)|6|12 months|60 days after discovery of defect||||| EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES BY SEA (OCT 2024)|2||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||| Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset Return to the date of asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined as physical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractors facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor is required to accurately report all transactions by the end of the fifth regular business day after receipt and the Action Date entered in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. The Contractor must obtain final inspection and acceptance by the Government for all assets within the RTATs established in the subsequent contract. Required RTAT: 110 days after receipt of asset. Throughput Constraint: Contractor must provide a throughput constraint for each NSN(s). Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences is X/month (contractor fill in #). A throughput of XXX per month reflects no throughput constraint. Induction Expiration Date: 365 days after contract award date. Any asset received after this date in days is not authorized for repair without bi-lateral agreement between the Contractor and NAVSUP WSS Contracting Officer. Reconciliation: A reconciliation modification will be issued after final inspection and acceptance of all assets inducted under the subsequent contract. The parties have agreed to a price (shown on the schedule page) for each unit at the negotiated RTAT. Such prices are based on the Contractor meeting the RTAT requirements described within the schedule page. If the Contractor does not meet the applicable RTAT requirement, consideration will be assessed and subject to negotiation. Price reduction made pursuant to this s section shall not limit other remedies available to the Government for failure to meet required RTATs, including but not limited to the Government's right to terminate for default. All contractual documents (i.e. contracts, purchase orders, task orders, delivery orders and modifications) related to the instant procurement are considered to be "issued" by the Government when copies are either deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile, or sent by other electronic commerce methods, such as email. The Government's acceptance of the contractor's proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to "issue" contractual documents as detailed herein. Early and incremental deliveries are accepted and preferred. \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 Articles to be furnished hereunder shall be repaired, tested and inspected in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the Requirements Section of this document. 1.1.1 Any item contracted for repair SHALL have a Statement of Work to ensure compliance with all repair procedures and requirements. Repair of: RECEIVER-TRANSMITTE ;5821016449424; NSN , ;H585A092-01; Part Number, Shall be performed IAW: RECEIVER-TRANSMITTE ;IAW LATEST REVISION.; Publication (s). 1.1.2 There will be no repair deviation from the approved written procedures without review and acceptance by the Basic Design Engineer. All requests for Waiver/Deviation shall be via Form 1694 routed throught the Local DCMA/ACO office for review and recommendations via form 1998. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 1.0 GENERAL 3.1.1 This Statement of Work (SOW) establishes the criteria for repair and testing /inspection of the subject item. It includes inspection, component repair and replacement,reassembly and testing procedures required to return units back into a servicable condition. 3.2 2.0 DEFINITIONS. 3.2.1 CONTRACTOR: Is defined as the successful offeror awarded a contract, orderor issued a project work order. The term "contract" encompasses a contract, an order, or a project work order. 3.2.2 OVERHAUL: An overhauled part is one which has been disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary (by replacing or repairing all components which have been found to exceed limits established by the repair/overhaul manual) reassembled and tested in accordance with the approved repair/overhaul manual listed in this SOW and returned to a Ready for Issue (RFI) condition (Refer to contract schedule for items to be overhauled). 3.2.3 REPAIR: A repaired part is one which has been restored to a Ready for Issue(RFI) condition (by replacing or repairing those components found to be defective, broken, damaged or inoperative during the initial evaluation and troubleshooting phase) and tested in accordance with the approved repair/overhaul manual listed in this SOW (Refer to contract schedule for items to be repaired). 3.3 3.0 SCOPE 3.3.1 GENERAL. The items to be furnished hereunder shall be overhauled, upgraded,repaired, tested, inspected, and accepted in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in this contract. Unless expressly provided Government Furnished Property, including equipment such as fixtures, jigs, dies, patterns, mylars, special tooling, special test equipment, or any other manufacturing aid required for the repair, manufacture, and/or testing of the subject item(s) will not be provided by the Government and shall be the responsibility of the contractor. The foregoing applies notwithstanding any reference to such equipment or the furnishing thereof that may be contained in any drawing, manual, or specification for the contract items. 3.3.2 REPAIR UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS:The contractor shall provide the necessary facility, labor, materials, parts, and test and tooling equipment required to to return the following items to a Ready For Issue (RFI) condition: RECEIVER-TRANSMITTE ;H585A092-01; P/N, ;5821016449424; NSN, ;IAW LATEST PUBLICATIONS.; Tech Publications 3.3.3 RFI is defined as that condition allowing the items to perform properly and reliably in an operational environment in a manner they were intended to operate.The contractor must perform all repairs/upgrades at the facility identified within this SOW. Repairs performed by the contractor or subcontractor shall be performed in accordance with the specified drawings and repair manual(s). 3.4 Changes to such manuals used for repairs under this contract, or changes to drawings or specifications used in the manufacture of parts utilized in these repairs, require Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) approval in accordance with the Configuration Management provisions of this Statement of Work or contract. Under no circumstances should the repair, test, and inspection extend beyond the requirements of this paragraph unless authorized by the Government QAR.In addition, requests for approval of changes to a repair source or repair facility shall be submitted in writing to the PCO prior to making any such change. 3.4.1 Any repairs performed using unapproved changes to such manuals, drawings, specifications, or changes to repair source or facility are done at the contractor's own risk. If the Government disapproves the requested change, the contractor shall replace any delivered items repaired using such unapproved manuals,drawing, specification, repair source or repair facility change. The contractor is not entitled to any equitable adjustment to the contract price or terms based on the Government's disapproval of a requested change to manuals, drawings, specifications, or to a repair source or facility. 3.4.2 References on Drawings and Specifications:For repair and overhaul purposes only. All references to the "prime contractor" or the "actual manufacturer" appearing on the drawings and / or specifications or technical data furnished by the Government shall be read as the "Government Designated Agency" 3.4.3 Process Control Documentation: The contractor shall prepare and maintain repair procedures, and test / inspection information / procedures which shall be made available to the Government for review and approval. The procedures shall include sequential diagrams of processes, as well as the performance specifications to perform the testing / inspection procedures. Those processes shall be frozen after approval of the inspection / Test. 3.4.4 Beyond Economical Repair (BER). An item is BER if the cost of the repair exceeds 75% of the production quantity price to replace the item, current at time of award. This replacement price is for the purposes of BER determinations only, and may not be used or relied on by the offeror in the pricing of the repairs required by this contract. Items determined BER are not included in the contract price. The contractor shall obtain written concurrence from DCMA for all units determined by the contractor to be BER. All such determinations, including the basis for the determination, the repair required, the proposed price to repair and the DCMA written concurrence shall be provided by the contractor to the PCO, with a copy to the inventory manager. After receipt of the required documentation, the PCO shall provide the contractor disposition instructions or contractual authority for repair of the item. The contractor is not authorized to proceed with the repair until notification to proceed is received from the PCO. Any disposal ordered shall be performed by the contractor in accordance with all applicable regulations and in accordance with all DCMA disposal procedures and requirements. 3.4.5 Missing on Induction (MOI). A Weapons Repairable Assembly (WRA) is subject to this MOI provision if the item received by the contractor for repair is missing one or more Shop Replaceable Assemblies (SRAs). Contractor replacement of MOI SRAs is not included in the contract price. The contractor shall immediately notify DCMA when an item is received with MOI SRA(s) and shall obtain written verification from DCMA for all WRAs determined to have MOI SRA(s). The contractor shall provide all such determinations, including identification of the missing SRA(s), and the DCMA written verification, to the Inventory Manager with a copy to the PCO and ACO prior to induction and/or repair of the WRA. The contractor shall not induct and/or repair WRAs with MOI SRAs until instructions on how to proceed are provided to the contractor by the Inventory Manager (where no adjustment price to the contract is required) or by the PCO. Items received by the contractor missing consumable parts are not MOI items. Rather, repair of such items and replacement of the missing consumable parts are included in the contract price and the item shall be inducted and repaired by the contractor under this contract. 3.4.6 Replacing Failed or Missing Shop Replaceable Assembly (SRA) when repairinga Weapons Replaceable Assembly (WRA). 3.4.7 A. When the contractor believes one or more SRA(s) within a WRA are either: 3.4.8 Beyond Economic Repair (BER) or Beyond Repair (BR) i. e. the unit is not capable of being repaired because of the extent of physical damage), or Missing on Induction (MOI), the contractor shall obtain written verification from DCMA and advice from the Inventory Manager whether a SRA may be replaced by one or more of the following options: Ship in place from an existing spares or repair contract, if any, MILSTRIP the SRA(s), otherwise be provided direction for obtaining the SRA(s) at no cost to the contractor.The detailed procedures are set forth in Section 6.0 of the WEB-BASED COMMERCIAL ASSET VISIBILITY (CAV) STATEMENT OF WORK. 3.4.9 B.When not otherwise provided for (or precluded) by other terms of this contract, the contractor may seek written authorization to replace failed SRA(s) with Ready For Issue SRA(s). When authorized, the procedures set forth in paragraph 3.0 of Section 6.2 of the WEB-BASED COMMERCIAL ASSET VISIBILITY (CAV) STATEMENT OF WORK shall be followed. 3.4.10 Over and Above Repair (OAR). An item sent to the contractor shall be considered to require over and above (OAR) repair effort if the repair required is not the type of repair that would be anticipated as a result of normal Navy operation of the item and is not included in the contract pricing due to the nature or scope of the repair needed for that particular item. Therefore, repair of OAR items may be subject to equitable adjustment. The Contractor shall obtain written concurrence from DCMA for all units determined by the contractor to require OAR effort. All such OAR determinations, including the basis for the determination, the repair required, the proposed price to repair and the DCMA written concurrence, shall be provided by the contractor to the PCO prior to undertaking repair of the item. After receipt of the required documentation, the PCO shall provide the contractor disposition instructions or contractual authority for repair of the item. Any ordered disposal shall be performed by the contractor in accordance with all applicable regulations and DCMA disposal procedures and requirements. 3.5 4.0 PARTS AND MATERIALS 3.5.1 General. The contractor is responsible for supplying all parts and material necessary to perform the required repairs under this contract unless parts or material are specifically identified as Government Furnished Material (GFM). All parts and material used in performance of this contract shall be in accordance with the latest approved revision of applicable drawings and specifications and shall be new in accordance with FAR 52.211-5, Material Requirements, which is incorporated by reference herein. Authorization to use other than new material as defined by FAR 52.211-5 requires written approval from the PCO. In addition, cannibalization must be approved by the PCO. Cannibalization of units that have not been inducted is not typically authorized and requires specific approval by the PCO. 3.5.2 The contractor shall ensure it has access for the duration of this contract to updated drawings and specifications for parts and material required for repairs performed under this contract. Any change to such parts/material drawings or specifications requires Government approval in accordance with the Configuration Management provisions of this Statement of Work. Written approval from the PCO must be obtained prior to any change to the manufacturing source or manufacturing facility for all parts which require source approval, unless the contractor is the Design Control Agent (DCA) (i.e. the entity responsible for maintaining the latest configuration data) for the the contract item. If the contractor is the DCA, the contractor may approve approve changes to manufacturing source or manufacturing facility for all parts, including those which require source approval. Any repairs performed using unapproved changes to such drawings, specifications or manufacturing source or facility are done at the contractor's own risk. If the Government disapproves the requested change, the contractor shall replace any delivered items repaired using such unapproved change. The contractor is not entitled to any equitable adjustment to the contract price or terms based on the Government's disapproval of a requested change to the drawings, specifications or manufacturing source or facility. 3.5.3 Purchased Material Control and Parts Control. The contractor shall establish and maintain a system of control over purchased parts and material. Such controls shall, at a minimum, assure that the parts and and material purchased are in compliance with the requirements of this contract. 3.5.4 Receiving Inspection of Purchased Parts and Material. (1)Purchased items shall be inspected upon receipt at the contractor's facility to assure conformance with all requirements of the applicable drawings and specifications or (2)the contractor shall provide prior to the contract award evidence for Government review and approval of a purchased parts and material system which provides for the inspections to assure conformance with all requirements of the applicable drawings and specifications. Evidence of such inspections of such inspections shall be maintained by the contractor or subcontractor for Government review.The inspection report shall, at a minimum, include a record of all dimensional data (coordinate/positional), material, finish, and process with appropriate pass/fail criteria such as certifications and actual dimensonal readings. 3.5.5 ^^^NOTE^^^PART CANNIBALIZATION IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY NAVSUP WSS AND THE BDE. 3.5.6 3.6 SOURCE AND LOCATION OF REPAIR SOURCE: 3.6.1 The contractor shall specify the name of the Source/Division performing the work and the actual location where work will be performed. RECEIVER-TRANSMITTE ;DATA LINK SOLUTIONS; Company Name , ;350 COLLINS RD NE CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52498; Address , ;081U3; Cage Code inspection will be accomplished on the contractor's equipment 3.7 5.0 CONTRACTOR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS: 3.7.1 Quality Program. The Contractor shall establish, implement, document and maintain a quality system that ensures conformance to all applicable requirements of ISO 9001/ SAE AS9100. The Contractor's quality management system/program shall be designed to promptly detect, correct and prevent conditions that adversely affect quality. 3.7.2 Calibration System Requirements. Contractor shall maintain a calibration system that meets the requirements of ANSI/NCSL Z540.3, ISO-10012-1 or an equivalent calibration program acceptable to the Government. 3.8 6.0 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM): 3.8.1 The contractor shall maintain a configuration management plan in accordance with the provisions of NAVSUP WSS configuration management clause NAVICPIA18. (Refer to contract). 3.9 7.0 MARKINGS. 3.9.1 Marking shall be as indicated in the contract when applicable. 3.10 8.0 STORAGE; 3.10.1 The contractor shall provide a proper enclosed warehouse environment for both material items awaiting repair and assets which have been repaired and are awaiting shipment to ensure the items are not damaged while being stored. 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS - NOT APPLICABLE. 5. PACKAGING- MIL-STD 2073 PACKAGING APPLIES AS FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THE SCHEDULE 6. NOTES - NOT APPLICABLE | Solicitation | 334220 | No Set-Aside | 10/23/2026 | 11/23/2026 | - | |
CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N763.09|P5E|771-229-3098|cody.p.cameron.civ@us.navy.mil| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| INSPECTION OF SUPPLIES--FIXED-PRICE (AUG 1996)|2||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|X|||||||| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and Receiving Report Combo|N/A|TBD|N00383|TBD|TBD|SEE SCHEDULE|TBD||||||||| NOTE FOR CONTRACTOR/ADMINISTRATIVE CONTRACTING OFFICER|4||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|PHILADELPHIA| MANDATORY USE OF WORKFLOW PRO (WFP) MOD ASSIST MODULE|1|X| WARRANTY OF SUPPLIES OF A NONCOMPLEX NATURE (JUN 2003)|6|12 Months|60 days after discovery of defect||||| EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (DEV 2026-O0040)(FEB 2026)|4||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| SECURITY PROHIBITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS (CLASS DEVIATION 2026-O0025)(FEB 2026)|7|||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEVIATION 2026-O0043)(FEB 2026))|13|||||||||||||| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2|DO-A7 || This solicitation is for the repair of NIIN 015311510, QTY 01. This is a sole source requirement. The Government physically does not have in its possession sufficient, accurate, or legible data to contract with other than the current source. These items require Government Source Approval prior to award. If you are not an approved source, you must submit, together with your proposal, the information detailed in the NAVSUP WSS Source Approval Brochure which can be obtained on the internet at https://www.navsup.navy.mil/public/nav sup/wss/business_opps/. Offers received which fail to provide all data required by the source approval brochure will not be considered for award under this solicitation. For information or questions regarding this notice, please contact Cody Cameron at the email address: Cody.p.Cameron.civ@us.navy.mil. NAVSUP WSS Requests proposals submitted in response to this solicitation remain valid for a minimum of 120 days following submission. All contractual documents related to the instant procurement are considered to be "issued" by the Government when copies are either deposited in the mail, transmitted by facsimile, or sent by other electronic commerce methods, such as email. The Government's acceptance of the contractor's proposal constitutes bilateral agreement to "issue" contractual documents as detailed herein. \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 Articles to be furnished hereunder shall be repaired, tested andinspected in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in theRequirements Section of this document. 1.2 Unless expressly provided for elsewhere in this clause, equipment suchas fixtures, jigs, dies, patterns, mylars, special tooling, test equipment, orany other manufacturing aid required for the manufacture and/or testing of the subject item(s) will not be provided by the Government or any other source and is the sole responsibility of the contractor. The foregoing applies notwithstanding any reference to such equipment or the furnishing thereof that may be contained in any drawing or referenced specification. 1.3 The use of MIL-W-81381 wire in any item to be delivered under this procurement is prohibited. The foregoing prohibition applies notwithstanding any reference to MIL-W-81381 wire that may be made in any of the drawings or specifications for this procurement. SAE-AS22759 series wire shall be used in lieu of MIL-W-81381 wire, in any place where MIL-W-81381 wire is cited in this procurement. Any questions concerning this requirement should be directed to the Procuring Contracting Officer. 1.4 If MIL-STD-454 is referenced in the drawings or in the specification,the contractor is expected to show compliance with IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C Personnel performing tasks in accordance with IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C shall be trained and certified as requried by IPC/EIAJ-STD-001C paragraph 5.1.4. 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 3. REQUIREMENTS - NOT APPLICABLE 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS - NOT APPLICABLE. 5. PACKAGING- MIL-STD 2073 PACKAGING APPLIES AS FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THE SCHEDULE 6. NOTES - NOT APPLICABLE | Solicitation | 334220 | No Set-Aside | 10/21/2026 | 11/20/2026 | - |
Additional Details
Solicitation Number
N00421-27-RFPREQ-TPM209-0199
Archive Date
Dec 8, 2026
Office Address
PATUXENT RIVER, MD, 20670-1545