Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services - Final Request for Propopsal (RFP)
Archived on December 31, 2025. Original response deadline: . Full description on SAM.gov.
Description
November 17, 2025, the purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to post Amendment 5 to the RFP and post revised responses to questions and answers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
November 13, 2025, the purpose of this announcement to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to inform industry that we intend to revise the proposal due date to November 21, 2025. An amendment reflecting this change will be forthcoming.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 1, 2025, the purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to post Amendment 4 to the RFP and post additional questions and answers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 29, 2025, the purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to post Amendment 3 to the RFP and post questions and answers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 19, 2025, the purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to post Amendment 2 to the RFP and replace the 80GSFC24R0042 FRFP Amendment 1 file that was uploaded on 9/18/2025.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 18, 2025, the purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to post Amendment 1 to the RFP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 3, 2025, Replaced the Final RFP GPM Exhibits 2-10 All IDIQ by CY excel spreadsheet that was uploaded on September 2, 2025 with the correct exhibits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 2, 2025 - The purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation, 80GSFC24R0042, is to post the Final Request for Proposal.
You are invited to submit a proposal in response to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center’s (GSFC) Program Analysis and Control (PAAC) VI solicitation. The principal purpose of this requirement is to provide a wide range of services necessary to support NASA in its planning and managing of missions/projects and programs, and related services for the NASA/GSFC’s Flight Projects Directorate. The contractor shall provide Project Planning and Control (PP&C), Financial Services, and associated functions for NASA Headquarters (HQ), Langley Research Center (LaRC), and GSFC Installations and Facilities. In addition, the PAAC VI contract will allow for work to be performed at the vendor's facility and/or other NASA Facilities and Installations as delineated under individual task orders. The PAAC VI contract will provide the following contractor support services: a) General Project Support, b) Planning and Scheduling, c) Earned Value Management, d) Configuration Management, e) Documentation Management, f) Risk Management, and g) Resource and Financial Management. This procurement may support other NASA Centers’ requirements as needed. The Statement of Work, Attachment A, describes the scope of the requirement.
NASA will conduct this acquisition as an 8(a) set-aside competition. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 541330 and the small business size standard is $25.5M.
This competitive acquisition will result in an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) with the ability to issue Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) task orders. The contract will have an effective ordering period of 5 years from the contract effective date.
The anticipated contract award date is June/July 2026, with an August 1, 2026 contract effective date. The contract will be performed onsite at NASA Headquarters (HQ), Langley Research Center (LaRC), and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Installations and Facilities, and offsite at the Contractor’s facilities.
Potential offerors should pay close attention to all solicitation instructions; however, the following requirements list is summarized to assist in proposal development. Please note that this list is not exhaustive, and the solicitation terms and conditions and provisions in sections L and M take precedence:
1. A Phase-in period will be conducted. Phase-In will be conducted, under a separate Firm-Fixed-Price contract or purchase order, during the 45-day period prior to the effective date of the contract.
2. The Government will make available existing Installation-Accountable Government Property (IAGP) for onsite contract performance and Government Furnished Property (GFP) for offsite use at the Contractor’s facility as described in the RFP.
3. NASA has determined that this acquisition may give rise to a potential organizational conflict of interest (OCI). Offerors should refer to NFS clause 1852.209-71 Limitation of Future Contracting, for a description of the potential conflict(s) and any restrictions on future contracting. Accordingly, the attention of prospective Offerors is invited to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 9.5, Organizational Conflicts of Interest. Offerors are required to submit an acceptable OCI Plan in accordance with the requirements of the Data Requirements Description (Attachment H.1). The proposed OCI Plan shall be consistent with all other areas of the proposal. The proposed OCI Plan is not page limited and shall be included as a separate proposal Attachment under Offer Volume I.
4. Please note a SECRET facilities clearance is required for this acquisition in accordance with the DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification. For proposals submitted as Joint Ventures, the facility clearance must be granted in the name of the Joint Venture.
5. NASA GSFC appreciates the comments received in response to the release of the Draft RFP. These comments resulted in improvements to the quality and content of the overall RFP. Offerors should review the RFP in its entirety, as its content has changed from the Draft RFP version. The following list identifies some areas where significant changes or clarifications have been made from the Draft RFP to this Final RFP that may not have been addressed in the Draft RFP questions and responses;
- Reduced the contract estimated value from $745M to $393.7M.
- Added the Limitations of Subcontracting Report as deliverable #25 to the GSFC Clause 52.211-90, Supplies and/or Services to be Provided.
- In Section L and M, reorganized Subfactor A and B. Subfactor A is now Management Approach and Subfactor B is now Technical Approach.
- In Section L, revised Subfactor B – Technical Approach, B.1 Requirements Approach to change the Statement of Work critical elements to 2.4, 4.4.6, 4.6.7, 4.7.2, 4.8.3, and 4.9.6.
- In Section L and M, revised Subfactor B – Technical Approach. Added B.3 Innovations.
- In Section L and M, revised the past performance average annual cost/fee for a significant subcontractor from $25M to $10M.
- Attachment A – Statement of Work was revised and dated August 2025.
- Attachment J was renamed to Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) and the Data Requirements Descriptions (DRDs) that were listed in Attachment J will be in separate attachments (e.g., Attachment H.1 - OCI DRD, Attachment L – Security Requirements for Unclassified IT DRD, Attachment M – CITAR DRD). In addition, a new DRD, Limitations of Subcontracting Report, Attachment N was added.
- Revised Enclosure 1 – Government Pricing Model to make modifications to the labor categories/position descriptions and reduce labor hours.
- Replaced Enclosure 3 – Government Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan in its entirety.
- Revised Exhibits 1A and 1B to make modifications to the labor categories and reduce labor hours.
This list is not intended to cover all changes nor describe all RFP requirements. Offerors should carefully review the RFP in its entirety.
6. Be advised, in accordance with provision GSFC 52.215-230, Past Performance Volume, offerors need to encourage their references to submit their Past Performance Questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer prior to proposal due date.
7. Offerors are required to have a Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code that matches the corporate address submitted with its proposal.
8. All reference material (i.e, sample task orders) will be uploaded to SAM.gov.
9. Offerors are encouraged to include Innovative Approaches to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency in their Mission Suitability Technical and Management Approaches.
Offerors are encouraged to refer to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provision 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS–COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION, in particular paragraph (f)(4) which discusses the Government’s right to award a contract without discussions.
In order to control and protect sensitive data owned by the Government and its Contractors, NASA policy required all acquisition-related documents be released in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF).
Documents related to this acquisition, including this letter, the solicitation, attachments, exhibits, any amendments and links to online reference/technical/bidders library will be attainable electronically from the World Wide Web through the Government-wide point of entry website at www.SAM.gov. Potential offerors are requested to periodically monitor the websites for updates.
When issuing new solicitations, Contracting Officers shall include the following notice:
“System updates may lag policy updates. The System for Award Management (SAM) may continue to require entities to complete representations based on provisions that are not included in agency solicitations. Examples include 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance, and paragraph (d) of 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Contracting officers will not consider these representations when making award decisions or enforce requirements. Entities are not required to, nor are they able to, update their entity registration to remove these representations in SAM.
NASA FAR Supplement (NFS) clause 1852.215-84, Ombudsman, is applicable. The Center Ombudsman for this acquisition can be found at https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/regs/Procurement-Ombuds-Comp-Advocate-Listing.pdf
This RFP does not commit NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to pay any proposal preparation costs, nor does it obligate NASA Goddard Space Flight Center to procure or contract for these services. This request is not an authorization to proceed and does not authorize payment for any charges incurred by the offeror for performing any of the work called for in this solicitation.
Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be due no later than 1:00pm EST on October 1, 2025. Proposals for this solicitation are required to be submitted through NASA’s Enterprise File Sharing and Sync Box (EFSS Box), a FedRAMP Moderate certified platform. Potential offerors, especially those that have not previously submitted a proposal utilizing NASA’s EFSS Box, are encouraged to review the solicitation instruction entitled “Electronic Proposal Delivery - Proposal Marking and Delivery Through NASA’s EFSS Box” which provides instructions related to the submission of proposal via EFSS Box. Offerors are encouraged to check with their corporate IT staff to determine if there are firewall restrictions that would need to be addressed prior to the submission of proposal files through NASA’s EFSS Box.
In accordance with NFS 1815.201(f), a “Blackout Notice” has been issued to NASA personnel. All inquiries/communications pertaining to this acquisition shall be directed only to the Contracting Officer listed below.
All questions regarding this RFP should be submitted in writing, electronically to Sherry Barbour, Contracting Officer, at Sherry.Barbour@nasa.gov on or before September 15, 2025. Offerors are encouraged to submit questions as soon as possible for consideration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to inform industry that the Final Request for Proposal (RFP) will be posted on Tuesday, September 2, 2025.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to inform industry that the Final Request for Proposal (RFP) estimated release date is being revised to late August 2025. In addition, the maximum ordering limitation is anticipated to be revised downward by approximately 35% to 45%.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this notification to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Solicitation is to inform industry that the Final Request for Proposal estimated release date is being revised to late June 2025.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this update to the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services Draft Request for Propopsal (DRFP) notice is to post the Industry Day Charts and the Draft RFP Questions and Answers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this amendment is to: 1) revise Section B, Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs; 2) revise Section I, Contract Clauses; 3) revise Section L, Subfactor B – Management Approach; 4) replace in its entirety Enclosure 1 - GPM; 5) replace in its entirety Enclosure 2 - Historical Data; 6) revise Exhibits 1A-1B; and 7) provide Industry Day information and supporting documents.
Industry Day Information
To facilitate open communication with industry, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) plans to conduct a Virtual Industry Day on March 28, 2025 for the Program and Analysis Control (PAAC) VI acquisition. The Industry Day will commence at 10:00AM via Microsoft Teams. The Industry Day is restricted to three (3) representatives per company.
RSVP
Interested vendors are to submit all required registration documentation/information to the Government by 4:00 PM, March 24, 2025.
Note: System updates may lag policy updates. The System for Award Management (SAM) may continue to require entities to complete representations based on provisions that are not included in agency solicitations. Examples include 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance, and paragraph (d) of 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Contracting officers will not consider these representations when making award decisions or enforce requirements. Entities are not required to, nor are they able to, update their entity registration to remove these representations in SAM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are invited to review and comment on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)’s Program Analysis & Control (PAAC) VI solicitation. The contractor shall provide Project Planning and Control (PP&C), Financial Services, and associated functions for NASA Headquarters (HQ), Langley Research Center (LaRC) and Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Installations and Facilities.
NASA will conduct this acquisition as an 8(a) set-aside competition. This competitive acquisition will result in a Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with the ability to issue Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) task orders. The contract will have an effective ordering period of 5 years from the contract effective date.
Any comments or questions regarding the DRFP should be submitted electronically in writing, to Sherry Barbour, Contracting Officer, at Sherry.Barbour@nasa.gov, no later than March 24, 2025.
Please note that we will be conducting an Industry Day on March 28, 2025. All industry day related forms will be posted shortly.
Please see the attached DRFP cover letter for additional information.
Overview
Award Overview
Possible prior contracts
Sign in to see possible prior contracts for this requirement (matched by agency, NAICS and place of performance; not confirmed).
Contacts
Contracting Officer
Primary Contact
Documents
Showing 10 of 74 items
Document | Source | Agency | Posted Date | File Size | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 429.5 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 332.79 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 247.21 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 232.45 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 179.58 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 345.81 KB | |||
e-Lirbary on Sam.gov.zip | Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 649.25 KB | ||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 134.88 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 205.22 KB | |||
| Solicitation | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION | Nov 17, 2025 | 114.18 KB |
Showing 1 to 10 of 74 results
Lifecycle
80GSFC24R0042- Pre-Solicitation
- Solicitation
Award typically follows within 30–90 days after the response deadline. (estimate)
- Pre-SolicitationOct 23, 2024
Presolicitation Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services
- 18×SolicitationCurrentMar 10, 2025
Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services - Final Request for Propopsal (RFP)
Similar Opportunities
Title | Phase | Agency | NAICS | Set Aside | Posted | Deadline | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In support of conjunction assessment and collision avoidance for NASA, the contractor will provide conjunction assessment screening services for all NASA uncrewed spacecraft, provide support of human spaceflight activities, and provide orbital safety analysis support to the Department of Commerce (DOC) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of Space Commerce. Requirements include performing screening of protected assets against the space object catalog (classified and unclassified portions), performing scripting and other analysis using catalog data, supporting launch and reentry activities, and supporting breakups and other events in addition to ensuring all personnel will be trained on all applicable mission systems required to perform OSA duties, inclusive of future missions. | Sole Source / J&A | 541330 | No Set-Aside | 10/08/2026 | Open | Greenbelt, MD | |
This RFI is for informational purposes only. It is not a request for proposals or a solicitation for a contract or grant award and it does not obligate the Government in any way. The Government will not reimburse respondents for any costs associated with responding to this request. Introduction The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) is seeking information from qualified vendors capable of supporting science and Earth science missions including, but not limited to: Earth Observing System; Earth Observing System Data and Operations System; Magnetospheric Multi-Scale mission; Global Precipitation Measurement mission; Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter; James Webb Space Telescope; Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope; Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (built by NASA for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope; and Solar Dynamics Observatory. This RFI is intended to gather market intelligence, technical approaches, and rough-order-of-magnitude (ROM) considerations to inform a potential future procurement. Background The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) currently acquires mission operations support through the Goddard Space Mission Operations (GSMO‑3) contract. GSMO‑3 provides comprehensive, end‑to‑end mission operations services spanning the entire mission life cycle. The scope of work includes systems and facility engineering; launch and early‑orbit operations support; flight operations and flight dynamics services; sustaining engineering; and mission operations studies, design, integration, and testing of ground systems. Additional services include mission data collection and distribution, system administration, and information technology security and engineering analyses. The GSMO‑3 contract supports a broad portfolio of NASA science and Earth science missions, including the Earth Observing System (EOS), Magnetospheric Multi‑Scale (MMS), Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Fermi Gamma‑ray Space Telescope, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). These services are essential to sustaining and advancing NASA’s ground data systems and mission operations infrastructure, ensuring reliable communication, data processing, and mission control capabilities for ongoing and future missions. The contract also supports mission decommissioning and long‑term sustaining engineering required to maintain operational readiness for systems with multidecade lifespans. The scope also increasingly encompasses cloud infrastructure management, continuous cybersecurity monitoring, DevSecOps automation, and advanced collision avoidance/conjunction assessment activities. Functions FUNCTION 1- Mission Ground System Support Services A. Ground Systems Engineering and Engineering Studies B. Ground Systems Support Services C. Ground Systems Integration and Test Services FUNCTION 2 - Mission Operations System Support Services A. Operations Systems Engineering B. Launch and Early Operations Support C. Flight Operations D. Flight Dynamics Support Services E. Mission Data Collection and Distribution F. Mission Systems Sustaining Engineering G. Systems Administration and IT Security H. Database Administration RFI Response Instructions The Government is seeking feedback from contractors with relevant mission capabilities and experience. Responses should include the vendor implementation approach and rough order magnitude costs of performing the functions listed above. Responses should be limited to no more than 30 pages. Transition from Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) The Government is evaluating the feasibility of transitioning the follow-on GSMO-4 requirement from a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) contract to a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract, either in whole or in part, including the use of Performance Based Payments for FFP Tasks. The Government seeks industry feedback regarding the practicality of such an approach. Specifically, respondents are requested to address the following: Is the current GSMO-4 scope sufficiently defined and stable to support an FFP contract? If not, identify the areas of uncertainty. What technical, programmatic, schedule, or cost risks would your organization associate with transitioning this requirement from CPAF to FFP? Which portions of the requirement, if any, do you believe are well-suited for FFP, and which portions would be more appropriately performed under another contract type (e.g., Time-and-Materials)? Please explain your rationale. What assumptions or Government-provided information (e.g., historical workload, staffing profiles, performance metrics, technical baseline, service level agreements, demand forecasts, configuration data) would be necessary for your organization to develop a realistic fixed-price proposal? What contract incentives or performance metrics would improve the viability of an FFP approach? What acquisition or contract structure would best balance cost control, performance, innovation, and risk allocation for this requirement? Please identify any lessons learned or best practices from similar transitions from Cost-Reimbursement to Firm-Fixed-Price contracts. Are there specific contract provisions or performance requirements that should be modified to enable a successful transition to FFP? Catalog Pricing Structure: The Government is exploring a 'Catalog-style' pricing structure for routine Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) operations, where missions are priced based on their Risk Classification (e.g., Class B, C, D). What are the benefits, risks, and potential cost-drivers your firm would associate with pricing mission operations by Class? What specific parameters, boundaries, or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) would be required in the catalog definitions to make this pricing model viable. Core vs. IDIQ Structure: The Government is considering a contract structure that establishes highly stable, long-term flagship missions as the baseline 'Core' requirement, with all other missions and development efforts issued as IDIQ task orders. How would this Core-plus-IDIQ structure impact your pricing, workforce retention, and risk allocation strategies compared to a 100% IDIQ structure. Requirements/Specifications Available Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Resources: The Government maintains operations resources listed above. RFI responses may include the use of these GFE resources. For any GFE resources incorporated in their response, the vendor should include any GSMO implementation costs and the cost differences/savings as compared to the vendor providing all ground resources. Update as of 10/1/26 Submission Format Requirements Use Times New Roman, 12‑point font for all text. Maintain 1‑inch margins on all sides of every page. The Cover Page and Table of Contents do not count toward the 30‑page limit. Please do not paginate these two sections. Submit your response in both PDF and Word (.docx) formats. Email all submissions directly to daniel.s.han@nasa.gov. In the email subject line, format the title exactly as: “Response to GSMO‑4 RFI [Company Name, CAGE Code]” Scope Guidance NASA welcomes submissions that provide limited scope information for internal market research. If your response covers only a portion of the contract scope, please clearly indicate “Limited Scope” on the Cover Page, along with a brief description of the capabilities included. Q&A Sessions The program intends to hold one‑on‑one Q&A sessions with vendors once the RFI period closes. Dates and duration for these sessions are TBD. | Market Research | 541330 | No Set-Aside | 10/07/2026 | 10/26/2026 | - | |
This RFI is for informational purposes only. It is not a request for proposals or a solicitation for a contract or grant award and it does not obligate the Government in any way. The Government will not reimburse respondents for any costs associated with responding to this request. Introduction The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) is seeking information from qualified vendors capable of supporting science and Earth science missions including, but not limited to: Earth Observing System; Earth Observing System Data and Operations System; Magnetospheric Multi-Scale mission; Global Precipitation Measurement mission; Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter; James Webb Space Telescope; Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope; Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (built by NASA for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope; and Solar Dynamics Observatory. This RFI is intended to gather market intelligence, technical approaches, and rough-order-of-magnitude (ROM) considerations to inform a potential future procurement. Background The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) currently acquires mission operations support through the Goddard Space Mission Operations (GSMO‑3) contract. GSMO‑3 provides comprehensive, end‑to‑end mission operations services spanning the entire mission life cycle. The scope of work includes systems and facility engineering; launch and early‑orbit operations support; flight operations and flight dynamics services; sustaining engineering; and mission operations studies, design, integration, and testing of ground systems. Additional services include mission data collection and distribution, system administration, and information technology security and engineering analyses. The GSMO‑3 contract supports a broad portfolio of NASA science and Earth science missions, including the Earth Observing System (EOS), Magnetospheric Multi‑Scale (MMS), Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Fermi Gamma‑ray Space Telescope, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). These services are essential to sustaining and advancing NASA’s ground data systems and mission operations infrastructure, ensuring reliable communication, data processing, and mission control capabilities for ongoing and future missions. The contract also supports mission decommissioning and long‑term sustaining engineering required to maintain operational readiness for systems with multidecade lifespans. The scope also increasingly encompasses cloud infrastructure management, continuous cybersecurity monitoring, DevSecOps automation, and advanced collision avoidance/conjunction assessment activities. Functions FUNCTION 1- Mission Ground System Support Services A. Ground Systems Engineering and Engineering Studies B. Ground Systems Support Services C. Ground Systems Integration and Test Services FUNCTION 2 - Mission Operations System Support Services A. Operations Systems Engineering B. Launch and Early Operations Support C. Flight Operations D. Flight Dynamics Support Services E. Mission Data Collection and Distribution F. Mission Systems Sustaining Engineering G. Systems Administration and IT Security H. Database Administration RFI Response Instructions The Government is seeking feedback from contractors with relevant mission capabilities and experience. Responses should include the vendor implementation approach and rough order magnitude costs of performing the functions listed above. Responses should be limited to no more than 30 pages. Transition from Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) The Government is evaluating the feasibility of transitioning the follow-on GSMO-4 requirement from a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) contract to a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract, either in whole or in part, including the use of Performance Based Payments for FFP Tasks. The Government seeks industry feedback regarding the practicality of such an approach. Specifically, respondents are requested to address the following: Is the current GSMO-4 scope sufficiently defined and stable to support an FFP contract? If not, identify the areas of uncertainty. What technical, programmatic, schedule, or cost risks would your organization associate with transitioning this requirement from CPAF to FFP? Which portions of the requirement, if any, do you believe are well-suited for FFP, and which portions would be more appropriately performed under another contract type (e.g., Time-and-Materials)? Please explain your rationale. What assumptions or Government-provided information (e.g., historical workload, staffing profiles, performance metrics, technical baseline, service level agreements, demand forecasts, configuration data) would be necessary for your organization to develop a realistic fixed-price proposal? What contract incentives or performance metrics would improve the viability of an FFP approach? What acquisition or contract structure would best balance cost control, performance, innovation, and risk allocation for this requirement? Please identify any lessons learned or best practices from similar transitions from Cost-Reimbursement to Firm-Fixed-Price contracts. Are there specific contract provisions or performance requirements that should be modified to enable a successful transition to FFP? Catalog Pricing Structure: The Government is exploring a 'Catalog-style' pricing structure for routine Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) operations, where missions are priced based on their Risk Classification (e.g., Class B, C, D). What are the benefits, risks, and potential cost-drivers your firm would associate with pricing mission operations by Class? What specific parameters, boundaries, or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) would be required in the catalog definitions to make this pricing model viable. Core vs. IDIQ Structure: The Government is considering a contract structure that establishes highly stable, long-term flagship missions as the baseline 'Core' requirement, with all other missions and development efforts issued as IDIQ task orders. How would this Core-plus-IDIQ structure impact your pricing, workforce retention, and risk allocation strategies compared to a 100% IDIQ structure. Requirements/Specifications Available Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Resources: The Government maintains operations resources listed above. RFI responses may include the use of these GFE resources. For any GFE resources incorporated in their response, the vendor should include any GSMO implementation costs and the cost differences/savings as compared to the vendor providing all ground resources. Update as of 10/1/26 Submission Format Requirements Use Times New Roman, 12‑point font for all text. Maintain 1‑inch margins on all sides of every page. The Cover Page and Table of Contents do not count toward the 30‑page limit. Please do not paginate these two sections. Submit your response in both PDF and Word (.docx) formats. Email all submissions directly to daniel.s.han@nasa.gov. In the email subject line, format the title exactly as: “Response to GSMO‑4 RFI [Company Name, CAGE Code]” Scope Guidance NASA welcomes submissions that provide limited scope information for internal market research. If your response covers only a portion of the contract scope, please clearly indicate “Limited Scope” on the Cover Page, along with a brief description of the capabilities included. Q&A Sessions The program intends to hold formal one‑on‑one Q&A sessions with vendors capable of delivering the full contract scope once the RFI period closes. Dates and duration for these sessions are TBD. | Market Research | 541330 | No Set-Aside | 10/06/2026 | 10/26/2026 | - | |
This RFI is for informational purposes only. It is not a request for proposals or a solicitation for a contract or grant award and it does not obligate the Government in any way. The Government will not reimburse respondents for any costs associated with responding to this request. Introduction The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) is seeking information from qualified vendors capable of supporting science and Earth science missions including, but not limited to: Earth Observing System; Earth Observing System Data and Operations System; Magnetospheric Multi-Scale mission; Global Precipitation Measurement mission; Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter; James Webb Space Telescope; Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope; Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (built by NASA for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope; and Solar Dynamics Observatory. This RFI is intended to gather market intelligence, technical approaches, and rough-order-of-magnitude (ROM) considerations to inform a potential future procurement. Background The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) currently acquires mission operations support through the Goddard Space Mission Operations (GSMO‑3) contract. GSMO‑3 provides comprehensive, end‑to‑end mission operations services spanning the entire mission life cycle. The scope of work includes systems and facility engineering; launch and early‑orbit operations support; flight operations and flight dynamics services; sustaining engineering; and mission operations studies, design, integration, and testing of ground systems. Additional services include mission data collection and distribution, system administration, and information technology security and engineering analyses. The GSMO‑3 contract supports a broad portfolio of NASA science and Earth science missions, including the Earth Observing System (EOS), Magnetospheric Multi‑Scale (MMS), Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Fermi Gamma‑ray Space Telescope, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). These services are essential to sustaining and advancing NASA’s ground data systems and mission operations infrastructure, ensuring reliable communication, data processing, and mission control capabilities for ongoing and future missions. The contract also supports mission decommissioning and long‑term sustaining engineering required to maintain operational readiness for systems with multidecade lifespans. The scope also increasingly encompasses cloud infrastructure management, continuous cybersecurity monitoring, DevSecOps automation, and advanced collision avoidance/conjunction assessment activities. Functions FUNCTION 1- Mission Ground System Support Services A. Ground Systems Engineering and Engineering Studies B. Ground Systems Support Services C. Ground Systems Integration and Test Services FUNCTION 2 - Mission Operations System Support Services A. Operations Systems Engineering B. Launch and Early Operations Support C. Flight Operations D. Flight Dynamics Support Services E. Mission Data Collection and Distribution F. Mission Systems Sustaining Engineering G. Systems Administration and IT Security H. Database Administration RFI Response Instructions The Government is seeking feedback from contractors with relevant mission capabilities and experience. Responses should include the vendor implementation approach and rough order magnitude costs of performing the functions listed below. Responses should be limited to no more than 30 pages. Transition from Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) The Government is evaluating the feasibility of transitioning the follow-on GSMO-4 requirement from a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) contract to a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract, either in whole or in part, including the use of Performance Based Payments for FFP Tasks. The Government seeks industry feedback regarding the practicality of such an approach. Specifically, respondents are requested to address the following: Is the current GSMO-4 scope sufficiently defined and stable to support an FFP contract? If not, identify the areas of uncertainty. What technical, programmatic, schedule, or cost risks would your organization associate with transitioning this requirement from CPAF to FFP? Which portions of the requirement, if any, do you believe are well-suited for FFP, and which portions would be more appropriately performed under another contract type (e.g., Time-and-Materials)? Please explain your rationale. What assumptions or Government-provided information (e.g., historical workload, staffing profiles, performance metrics, technical baseline, service level agreements, demand forecasts, configuration data) would be necessary for your organization to develop a realistic fixed-price proposal? What contract incentives or performance metrics would improve the viability of an FFP approach? What acquisition or contract structure would best balance cost control, performance, innovation, and risk allocation for this requirement? Please identify any lessons learned or best practices from similar transitions from Cost-Reimbursement to Firm-Fixed-Price contracts. Are there specific contract provisions or performance requirements that should be modified to enable a successful transition to FFP? Catalog Pricing Structure: The Government is exploring a 'Catalog-style' pricing structure for routine Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) operations, where missions are priced based on their Risk Classification (e.g., Class B, C, D). What are the benefits, risks, and potential cost-drivers your firm would associate with pricing mission operations by Class? What specific parameters, boundaries, or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) would be required in the catalog definitions to make this pricing model viable. Core vs. IDIQ Structure: The Government is considering a contract structure that establishes highly stable, long-term flagship missions as the baseline 'Core' requirement, with all other missions and development efforts issued as IDIQ task orders. How would this Core-plus-IDIQ structure impact your pricing, workforce retention, and risk allocation strategies compared to a 100% IDIQ structure. Requirements/Specifications Available Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Resources: The Government maintains operations resources listed below. RFI responses may include the use of these GFE resources. For any GFE resources incorporated in their response, the vendor should include any GSMO implementation costs and the cost differences/savings as compared to the vendor providing all ground resources. Update as of 10/1/26 Submission Format Requirements Use Times New Roman, 12‑point font for all text. Maintain 1‑inch margins on all sides of every page. The Cover Page and Table of Contents do not count toward the 30‑page limit. Please do not paginate these two sections. Submit your response in both PDF and Word (.docx) formats. Email all submissions directly to daniel.s.han@nasa.gov. In the email subject line, format the title exactly as: “Response to GSMO‑4 RFI [Company Name, CAGE Code]” Scope Guidance NASA welcomes submissions that provide limited scope information for internal market research. If your response covers only a portion of the contract scope, please clearly indicate “Limited Scope” on the Cover Page, along with a brief description of the capabilities included. Q&A Sessions The program intends to hold formal one‑on‑one Q&A sessions with vendors capable of delivering the full contract scope once the RFI period closes. Dates and duration for these sessions are TBD. | Market Research | 541330 | No Set-Aside | 10/01/2026 | 10/26/2026 | - | |
This RFI is for informational purposes only. It is not a request for proposals or a solicitation for a contract or grant award and it does not obligate the Government in any way. The Government will not reimburse respondents for any costs associated with responding to this request. Introduction The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) is seeking information from qualified vendors capable of supporting science and Earth science missions including, but not limited to: Earth Observing System; Earth Observing System Data and Operations System; Magnetospheric Multi-Scale mission; Global Precipitation Measurement mission; Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter; James Webb Space Telescope; Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope; Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (built by NASA for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration); Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope; and Solar Dynamics Observatory. This RFI is intended to gather market intelligence, technical approaches, and rough-order-of-magnitude (ROM) considerations to inform a potential future procurement. Background The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) currently acquires mission operations support through the Goddard Space Mission Operations (GSMO‑3) contract. GSMO‑3 provides comprehensive, end‑to‑end mission operations services spanning the entire mission life cycle. The scope of work includes systems and facility engineering; launch and early‑orbit operations support; flight operations and flight dynamics services; sustaining engineering; and mission operations studies, design, integration, and testing of ground systems. Additional services include mission data collection and distribution, system administration, and information technology security and engineering analyses. The GSMO‑3 contract supports a broad portfolio of NASA science and Earth science missions, including the Earth Observing System (EOS), Magnetospheric Multi‑Scale (MMS), Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Fermi Gamma‑ray Space Telescope, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES), Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). These services are essential to sustaining and advancing NASA’s ground data systems and mission operations infrastructure, ensuring reliable communication, data processing, and mission control capabilities for ongoing and future missions. The contract also supports mission decommissioning and long‑term sustaining engineering required to maintain operational readiness for systems with multidecade lifespans. The scope also increasingly encompasses cloud infrastructure management, continuous cybersecurity monitoring, DevSecOps automation, and advanced collision avoidance/conjunction assessment activities. Functions FUNCTION 1- Mission Ground System Support Services A. Ground Systems Engineering and Engineering Studies B. Ground Systems Support Services C. Ground Systems Integration and Test Services FUNCTION 2 - Mission Operations System Support Services A. Operations Systems Engineering B. Launch and Early Operations Support C. Flight Operations D. Flight Dynamics Support Services E. Mission Data Collection and Distribution F. Mission Systems Sustaining Engineering G. Systems Administration and IT Security H. Database Administration RFI Response Instructions The Government is seeking feedback from contractors with relevant mission capabilities and experience. Responses should include the vendor implementation approach and rough order magnitude costs of performing the functions listed below. Responses should be limited to no more than 30 pages. Transition from Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) The Government is evaluating the feasibility of transitioning the follow-on GSMO-4 requirement from a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) contract to a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract, either in whole or in part, including the use of Performance Based Payments for FFP Tasks. The Government seeks industry feedback regarding the practicality of such an approach. Specifically, respondents are requested to address the following: Is the current GSMO-4 scope sufficiently defined and stable to support an FFP contract? If not, identify the areas of uncertainty. What technical, programmatic, schedule, or cost risks would your organization associate with transitioning this requirement from CPAF to FFP? Which portions of the requirement, if any, do you believe are well-suited for FFP, and which portions would be more appropriately performed under another contract type (e.g., Time-and-Materials)? Please explain your rationale. What assumptions or Government-provided information (e.g., historical workload, staffing profiles, performance metrics, technical baseline, service level agreements, demand forecasts, configuration data) would be necessary for your organization to develop a realistic fixed-price proposal? What contract incentives or performance metrics would improve the viability of an FFP approach? What acquisition or contract structure would best balance cost control, performance, innovation, and risk allocation for this requirement? Please identify any lessons learned or best practices from similar transitions from Cost-Reimbursement to Firm-Fixed-Price contracts. Are there specific contract provisions or performance requirements that should be modified to enable a successful transition to FFP? Catalog Pricing Structure: The Government is exploring a 'Catalog-style' pricing structure for routine Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) operations, where missions are priced based on their Risk Classification (e.g., Class B, C, D). What are the benefits, risks, and potential cost-drivers your firm would associate with pricing mission operations by Class? What specific parameters, boundaries, or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) would be required in the catalog definitions to make this pricing model viable. Core vs. IDIQ Structure: The Government is considering a contract structure that establishes highly stable, long-term flagship missions as the baseline 'Core' requirement, with all other missions and development efforts issued as IDIQ task orders. How would this Core-plus-IDIQ structure impact your pricing, workforce retention, and risk allocation strategies compared to a 100% IDIQ structure. Requirements/Specifications Available Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) Resources: The Government maintains operations resources listed below. RFI responses may include the use of these GFE resources. For any GFE resources incorporated in their response, the vendor should include any GSMO implementation costs and the cost differences/savings as compared to the vendor providing all ground resources. | Market Research | 541330 | No Set-Aside | 09/24/2026 | 10/26/2026 | - |
Additional Details
Solicitation Number
80GSFC24R0042
Archive Date
Dec 31, 2025
Office Address
GREENBELT, MD, 20771