Notice ID: d0a0d4e7afc24f2d873ec19348ae71f1Solicitation
Communication Managerial Security Support Services - Colombia (CO-D-GAK)
Archived on July 9, 2026. Original response deadline: . Full description on SAM.gov.
Description
Communication Managerial Security Support Services - Colombia (CO-D-GAK) (2026-2031) This is a non-personal service contract for COMSEC custodians supporting Colombia (FMS case CO-D-GAK). Includes housing, utilities, travel, mobilization/demobilization of personnel, and ODCs associated/outlined the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
Overview
Agency:
Department of WarDepartment of the Air Force
Office:FA8307 AFLCMC HNCK HNC CYBER & NTR
Posted:June 25, 2026
NAICS:541513: Computer Facilities Management Services
Last Updated:Sep 25, 2026
PSC:R426: SUPPORT- PROFESSIONAL: COMMUNICATIONS
Set-Aside:Small Business Set Aside - Total
Type:Solicitation
Place of Performance:Not specified
Award Overview
Possible prior contracts
Sign in to see possible prior contracts for this requirement (matched by agency, NAICS and place of performance; not confirmed).
Contacts
Contracting Officer
Primary Contact
Documents
Select documents to download
Showing 10 of 14 items
Document | Source | Agency | Posted Date | File Size | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 1.34 MB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 250.27 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 94.5 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 444.98 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 186.27 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 121.69 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 186.4 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 186.84 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 199.68 KB | |||
| Solicitation | DEPT OF THE AIR FORCE | Jun 25, 2026 | 147.47 KB |
Showing 1 to 10 of 14 results
Lifecycle
Solicitation:
FA830726RB033- Solicitation
Award typically follows within 30–90 days after the response deadline. (estimate)
- 2×SolicitationCurrentMay 29, 2026
Communication Managerial Security Support Services - Colombia (CO-D-GAK)
Similar Opportunities
Title | Phase | Agency | NAICS | Set Aside | Posted | Deadline | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
See attached Statement of Objectives Place of Delivery/Performance/Acceptance/FOB Point: Walter Graves AFCEC/CIMW 3515 S. General McMullen Drive San Antonio, TX 78226 | Combined Synopsis | 541620 | Total Small Business Set-Aside | 07/05/2026 | 07/17/2026 | - | |
TITLE: Multiple Award Task Order Contract for Architect-Engineering (A-E) Services for FSRM and MILCON Title I and Title II projects at Andersen AFB (AE25GUAM)THIS SYNOPSIS IS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE WITH A HUBZONE RESERVE OF TWO (2) FIRMS. THE AIR FORCE WILL ONLY ACCEPT SF330?S, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS, FROM FIRMS THAT ARE CERTIFIED AS A SMALL BUSINESS FOR NAICS 541330, WITH A SIZE STANDARD OF $25,500,000.SF330 DUE DATE: The Due Date for SF330 submissions will be 2 March 2026 by 2:00 PM Central Standard Time. SF330 submissions shall be submitted via Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). The Government will not accept any further questions. THE OFFEROR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING THAT THEIR SF330 WAS RECEIVED BY THE GOVERNMENT. The Air Force Installation Contracting Center (AFICC)/772nd Enterprise Sourcing Squadron (772 ESS) in conjunction with the Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC), Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland Air Force Base, TX, desires to contract with Small Business (SB) Architect-Engineer (A-E) firms to support Facility Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (FSRM) and Military Construction (MILCON) Title I and Title II projects primarily located at Andersen Air Force Base (AAFB), Guam, and Naval Base Guam as well as other locations within Joint Region Marianas (JRM). The 772 ESS anticipates award of an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) contract for A-E services to support these A-E Services for Title I and Title II services for FSRM and MILCON planning and design, with a total contract ceiling of $930M, shared among all contract holders. The 772 ESS anticipates making awards to approximately six (6) Small Business firms. The Government reserves the right to award to more firms, fewer firms, or none. The Task Order limitation will be a minimum of $2,500 and maximum of $50M, subject to the conditions of FAR 52.216-19 - Order Limitations. ORDERING PERIOD AND CONTRACT TYPE: Each basic IDIQ contract within the MATOC will have an ordering period of ten years comprised of one (1) three-year base period, with one (1) three-year option period and two (2) two-year option periods. This MATOC allows for the issuance of Firm Fixed Price (FFP) negotiated task orders during the ordering period. *****THIS CONTRACT OPPORTUNITY HAS BEEN FORMERLY PUBLISHED UNDER NOTICE ID FA8903-24-R-099, FA8903-GUAM-AE-IDIQ, AND FA8903-GUAM-JRM BUT SHALL FROM THIS POINT ON BE PUBLISHED UNDER NOTICE ID FA8903-26-R-0014.***** | Combined Synopsis | 541330 | Total Small Business Set-Aside | 02/27/2026 | 03/02/2026 | - | |
Request for Information Multi-X Security (MXS) Platform Operations and Maintenance 15 October 2026 1.0 Description The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, in support of the Advanced Technology Branch (AFLCMC/HNJT), is seeking information from interested companies with the capability to provide Operations and Maintenance, and continuous modernization of the Multi-X Security (MXS) Platform. 2.0 Background Between 2019 and 2026, the Advanced Technology program office developed the MXS (pronounced “Maxis”) Platform as a modern security model, data model, reference architecture, and reference implementation, based on open standards and protocols to support software development and secure information sharing at multiple security levels. MXS' goal is to enable Protection Level 3 (PL3) software solution development by third-party developers within security-constrained environments, as typically employed by communities working with Special Access Programs (SAPs). 3.0 Description of Requirements 3.1 Scope & Operating Environment: AFLCMC/HNJT requires information on industry capabilities to operate, maintain, and continuously enhance a multi-tenant, cloud-native platform supporting Air Force and mission-partner applications. The platform operates across multiple security enclaves, including Unclassified, Secret//Special Access Required (SAR), Top Secret//SAR, and Top Secret//Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI)//SAR cloud environments. 3.2 Platform Operations, Maintenance & DevSecOps: Prospective contractors are expected to provide proactive 24/7/365 system availability, platform administration, and lifecycle sustainment across all designated cloud environments. Core focus areas include: 3.2.1 Cloud-Native Infrastructure: Operating and maintaining containerized environments (e.g., Kubernetes), service meshes, Application Programming Interface (API) gateways, and Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) baselines. 3.2.2 DevSecOps Toolchain: Sustaining an automated continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline that enables secure cross-domain software progression. 3.2.3 Telemetry & Resource Monitoring: Providing automated, granular visibility into platform health, microservice performance, compute/storage utilization, and licensing. 3.2.4 Enterprise ICAM & Certificate Services: operate and maintain enterprise identity management infrastructure across multiple tenants. 3.2.5 Managed Database Services, Registered Queries & API Mediation: Provision, sustain, and optimize managed database services across cloud environments, engineer registered and parameterized queries for controlled data access and governance, and diagnose latency or throughput bottlenecks. 3.3 Continuous Platform Evolution: Delivering agile enhancements, feature updates, and technical debt remediation in alignment with government-prioritized backlogs. 3.4 Tenant Enablement & Multi-Tier Support: To support diverse tenant software programs, the platform requires integrated customer enablement services. 3.4.1 Tenant Onboarding and Offboarding: Assisting tenant developer teams with architectural guidance, common control inheritance, and standardized integration toolkits. 3.4.2 Service Desk Operations: Operating a tiered technical service desk (Tier 1–3) providing incident management, troubleshooting, and user assistance across all classification levels. 3.5 Cybersecurity & Continuous Authorization: The platform must maintain a rigorous cybersecurity posture compliant with DoD, Intelligence Community, and SAP directives. 3.5.1 Sustaining existing Risk Management Framework (RMF) Authorizations to Operate (ATOs). 3.5.2 Executing Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), container vulnerability assessments, dependency assessments (Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange (VeX), etc.), and rapid vulnerability remediation. 3.5.3 Generating and maintaining RMF bodies of evidence and security documentation to maintain inheritance relationships for hosted software and systems. 3.6 Potential Security, Facility, and Personnel Requirements. The Government is conducting market research regarding the availability, timing, and feasibility of contractor personnel clearances, secure facilities, and cybersecurity qualifications that may be required for a future acquisition. The requirements of any future solicitation, including timing and acceptability of facilities, will be established only in that solicitation. 3.6.1 Personnel Clearances: Contractor personnel must possess active Top Secret clearances and applicable DoD 8140 baseline certifications at the time of contract award, with the ability to obtain SCI and SAP access within 30 days of contract award 3.6.2 Secure Facilities: Within 30 days of contract award, the Contractor shall possess and maintain accredited Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIFs)/Special Access Program Facility (SAPFs), as required to perform the classified development and operational activities under this contract. Each facility shall maintain current written accreditation by the cognizant accrediting authority and comply with applicable requirements of ICD 705, DoDM 5105.21, Volume 2, and DoDM 5205.07. 4.0 Specific Areas of Interest 4.1 Corporate Overview & Business Classification 4.1.1 Entity Identification: State your company name, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, and business size/socioeconomic status under the designated North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code. 4.1.2 Contract Vehicles: List the relevant Government-Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs), Multiple Award Schedules (e.g., GSA MAS, NASA SEWP, OASIS+), or agency vehicles your organization currently holds. 4.2 Experience & Technical Approach 4.2.1 Relevant Past Performance: Provide up to three (3) examples (within the past 5 years) demonstrating prime or major subcontractor experience operating multi-tenant cloud platforms of comparable scope, complexity, and classification (including Amazon Web Services (AWS)/Azure Secret, Top Secret, or SAP enclaves). 4.2.2 Platform Management & DevSecOps: Describe your experience managing cloud-native infrastructure (e.g., Kubernetes, service mesh, Infrastructure as Code (IaC)) and sustaining multi-fabric DevSecOps pipelines across air-gapped or cross-domain environments. 4.2.3 Platform Software Development Kits (SDKs) & Toolkits: Summarize your experience developing and sustaining SDKs, shared libraries, and developer modules to accelerate tenant application delivery. 4.2.4 Enterprise Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM) & Certificate Services: Describe your experience deploying and sustaining enterprise and external Certificate Authorities (CAs) across multi-tenant and air-gapped environments, including certificate validation and revocation infrastructure (e.g., Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responders, Certificate Revocation List (CRL) distribution points). 4.2.5 Managed Database Services, Registered Queries & API Mediation: Describe your experience provisioning, optimizing, and troubleshooting cloud-managed database services, including engineering registered and parameterized queries for controlled access and governance. Detail your experience developing middleware, abstraction layers, or gateway adapters for protocol bridging, query translation, and data transformation across disparate APIs. 4.2.6 Protection Level 3 (PL-3) Multi-Level Access Control & Attribute-Based Authorization: Describe your experience engineering and operating applications within PL3 SAR environments to restrict data access to users' explicit clearance and compartment authorizations. Detail your approach to synchronizing identity attributes from Authoritative Data Sources (ADS) and implementing, enforcing, and auditing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Mandatory Access Control (MAC), and Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) policies using Policy Enforcement Points (PEPs), Policy Decision Points (PDPs), and fine-grained, object-level filtering and data labeling. 4.3 Tenant Enablement & Multi-Tenant Operations 4.3.1 Onboarding & Isolation: Describe your approach to onboarding diverse tenant applications to a shared cloud environment while maintaining strict logical isolation, zero trust boundaries, and zero service interruption to existing tenants. 4.3.2 Training & Enablement: Outline the standard onboarding artifacts, API documentation, and training support that should be provided to tenant engineering teams. 4.3.3 Tiered Technical Support: Describe your operational model for delivering Tier 1–3 service desk and platform support across both unclassified and classified environments. 4.3.4 Service Level Agreements (SLAs) & Operational Sustainment: Describe your recommended Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for the platform, such as uptime/availability targets, incident response and resolution thresholds by severity, performance baselines, and Recovery Time Objective (RTO)/Recovery Point Objective (RPO) across unclassified and classified environments. Detail your operational support model, monitoring tooling, escalation procedures, and staffing strategy to guarantee and report on compliance with these metrics. 4.4 Cybersecurity & Compliance 4.4.1 Continuous Authorization: Detail your methodology for maintaining RMF accreditation. 4.4.2 Security Test Automation: Summarize your approach to code scanning and test automation to include tools, artifacts, processes, and gating criteria within a DevSecOps pipeline. 4.4.3 Security Standards Compliance: Outline your experience implementing JSIG/CNSSI 1253 Rev 5, DoDM 5205.07, Zero Trust Architecture, or any other applicable DoD/DoW requirements. 4.5 Security Clearances & Facilities 4.5.1 Personnel Clearance Readiness: Describe your labor pipeline and ability to provide qualified, certified personnel with Top Secret clearances with eligibility for access to SCI and SAP, and general timelines. 4.5.2 Secure Facility: Confirm whether your organization currently operates an accredited SCIF/SAPF suitable for classified contract execution or has a facility that could be accredited or modified within 30 days of contract award to meet applicable ICD 705 and SAP security requirements within the required contract performance timeline. 4.6 Cost Models, Funding Intake & Contract Structure 4.6.1 Cost Drivers: Identify primary cost drivers for baseline platform sustainment versus new feature development. 4.6.2 Consumption Metering & Showback: Describe your approach to tracking and reporting tenant consumption (compute, storage, service desk) to support customer-funded usage and line-of-accounting showback/chargeback. 4.6.3 Contract Structure Recommendations: Recommend suitable contract types (e.g., Firm Fixed Price, Time & Materials, hybrid) and incentive structures that balance performance, flexibility, and risk. 4.7 Contemplated Gating Strategy Feedback: The Government is contemplating an administrative Pass/Fail Phase 1 gate evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis (e.g., verified prime contractor experience of similar scope, active facility clearance/accreditation, and baseline cyber certifications) prior to technical proposal evaluation. The contemplated gating approach is provided solely to obtain market research feedback. The Government has not established final evaluation factors, minimum qualification requirements, acquisition strategy, contract type, or source-selection methodology. Any future solicitation will independently state all applicable requirements and evaluation criteria. 4.7.1 Impact on Competition: Does the proposed Phase 1 gate unduly restrict your organization’s ability to compete as a prime contractor or participate as part of a joint venture/team? If yes, fully explain. 4.7.2 Recommended Criteria: What objective metrics, scope parameters, or dollar thresholds should define "similar experience" to ensure robust, qualified competition? 5.0 Response Interested vendors are invited to submit an unclassified capability statement demonstrating their ability to satisfy Section 3.0 requirements, along with detailed responses to the questions in Section 4.0. Do not include classified or SAP data in the submission. Submissions must not exceed twelve (12) single-spaced, single-sided pages (8.5 × 11 inch, 12-point font). Please send responses to this RFI electronically to the Contract Specialist within thirty (30) days after publication of this announcement. Questions concerning this RFI should be directed to Capt Matthew Gauert via email at matthew.gauert.2@us.af.mil with the subject line “RFI Response - MXS Platform O&M - [Company Name].” Note: only electronic responses will be considered. Respondent’s information shall contain respondent company name; company address; primary point of contact for information provided; and company website address that provides any additional information about the respondent’s company. Respondents shall clearly identify and mark any proprietary or confidential commercial information contained in their submissions. The Government will protect properly identified information from disclosure to the extent authorized by law and regulation. Information received may be used solely for market research and acquisition-planning purposes. Submission of a response does not grant the Government any license or other rights in a respondent’s proprietary information beyond those necessary to evaluate and use the response for those purposes. 6.0 Summary This RFI does not constitute an Invitation for Bids (IFB), Request for Proposal, Request for Quote (RFQ), nor does this issuance restrict the Government’s acquisition approach. Any information received is considered market research and may be utilized by the Air Force in developing its acquisition strategy. This market research will be used to assess the availability and adequacy of potential sources. The Government will not respond or conduct formal or informal briefings to vendors or respondents to this RFI. The Government does not reimburse respondents for any costs associated with submission of information being requested/received, nor reimburse expenses incurred to interested parties for responses to this RFI. THIS RFI IS ISSUED SOLELY FOR INFORMATION AND PLANNING PURPOSES AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SOLICITATION. THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT INTEND TO AWARD A CONTRACT ON THE BASIS OF THIS RFI, AND RESPONSES TO THIS NOTICE ARE NOT OFFERS AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO FORM A BINDING CONTRACT. RESPONSES TO THIS RFI WILL NOT BE RETURNED. | Market Research | 541513 | No Set-Aside | 10/15/2026 | 11/16/2026 | 0, MA | |
This requirement is an urgent single source, commercial service procurement and will be sole sourced to Unify/MCS. The resulting firm fixed price contract award will be to one large business contractor. It was determined due to the level information of the requirement, MCS of Tampa system software maintenance patches, and ability to perform remote diagnostics and corrective maintenance, the procurement would be limited to be solicited via sole source methods to MSC of Tampa. MCS of Tampa is the only source that can provide the requirement and is certified by the Department of the Air Force to have command post system maintenance, components, and equipment. The 509th Bomb Wing requires,support/parts replacement for the console the Command Post utilizes on a daily basis for all notifications.Equipment serves as the Command Post's primary telephone system with conferencing and radio capabilities. The Contractor will provide a full/unlimited one-year warranty for all hardware/software, materials, and workmanship related to command post communications system maintenance. The warranty will include emergency technical assistance as required, including 24/7 remote dial-in and on-site responses, as appropriate, for system failures. If a catastrophic failure occurs, the Contractor will perform a service call.The Contractor will provide a full/unlimited one-year warranty for all hardware/software, materials, and workmanship related to command post communications system maintenance. In support of the maintenance and services described above, the Contractor will provide the following annual warranties/services: 1)Audiocodes : Mediant 800B with 2 E1/T1 voice interfaces and 4 8)OpenScape Desk: Phone IP 35G HFA txt black Active/Standby GE LAN ports. software Support. 2)AudiocodesMediant 800B 4 FXS voice int 2 Active/Standby GE LAN 9)SSP 1Y for openscape Xpert V7 advanced client ports/V.150 functionality License 3)Controller Positions - Primary CP 10)iNem soft Radio Interface Support 4)Shuttle Fanless Slim PC 11)ASC Voice Recorder support 5)Teguar Touch Screen Monitor with Display Port/USB for the Shuttle PC 12)MCS help desk remote and onsite support labor 6)Handset 6-wire PTT 7)Tripp Lite UPS 1500VA 940W Battery Back Up Tower AVR 120V RJ45 | Pre-Solicitation | 541513 | No Set-Aside | 09/28/2026 | 10/13/2026 | Whiteman Air Force Base, MO | |
CLARIFICATION REGARDING AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR LETTERS The Government has received questions regarding the requirement to provide "authorized distributor letters" under Section F of the Sources Sought. The Government clarifies the following: Authorized distributor letters are only required for respondents whose proposed solutions include physical hardware, IT equipment, or commercial software licenses. Respondents proposing purely professional services, customized solutions, or approaches that do not involve non-manufactured items, commercial software, or hardware are not required to submit these letters. The omission of authorized distributor letters by services-only respondents will have no impact on the evaluation of capability or the compliance of the submission. All other instructions and the response deadline of 08 October 2026 remain unchanged. Notice: This is not a solicitation but rather a Sources Sought Synopsis to determine potential sources for information and planning purposes only. The purpose of this Sources Sought is to conduct market research to determine if responsible sources exist, to assist in determining if this effort can be competitive and/or a total Small Business Set-Aside. PLEASE SEE ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS FOR FURTHER DETAILS AND VENDOR CAPABILITY QUESTIONS Program Details: The MABSM application is a highly customized, mission-critical Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) system. Originally built on a baseline commercial Impresa MRO/ERP software foundation, the system has undergone extensive, continuous customization over the past 24 years. To date, the MABSM baseline includes over 242,000 custom code changes, program specifications, testing criteria, and complex interface logic. These modifications enable real-time communication with 17 legacy Department of Defense (DoD) systems. This highly specialized, proprietary configuration of the COTS software bears little structural resemblance to its commercial progenitor and operates as a unique hybrid system. MABSM operates and is sustained within the Department of the Air Force's Cloud 1 enterprise cloud environment, leveraging DoD Impact Level 4/5 (IL4/IL5) secure cloud infrastructure. Sourcing specialized contractors who can operate seamlessly within Cloud 1's DevSecOps frameworks, managed services, and security boundaries is crucial to system stability. MABSM dictates the real-time tracking of critical assets, including aircraft parts, financial transactions, and Nuclear Weapons-Related Material (NWRM) items. Due to the high-tempo depot environments in which it is deployed, the system requires a performance baseline exceeding 95% system uptime and near-zero code degradation. Furthermore, national security mandates dictate 100% real-time accountability of NWRM items within any given 24-hour period. Instructions: The Government requests interested parties provide the following information (please limit your response to no more than 10 pages): Company Name and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code. Name, phone number, and email address for point of contact(s). The applicable NAICS Code for this acquisition is _______. Based on this NAICS Code, what is your size status? ______ Small Business ______ Small Disadvantaged ______ Women-Owned ______ Veteran-Owned ______ Service-Disabled Veteran Owned ______ Hub-Zone ______ 8(a) ______ Large Business Are you currently registered in SAM.gov and WAWF? The NAICS Code selected for this potential requirement is 541513 or 541519, which has a size standard of $37M or $24M. If you disagree that 541513 or 541519 is the proper NAICS Code, please submit that comment to the requiring activity along with what NAICS Code you believe this should be classified under; however, please do not wait for an amendment to this request. The due date for the market survey will remain at 08 October 2026. This date will not be extended. Provide any authorized distributor letters as necessary for non-manufactured items that state you are authorized distributors for Hill AFB, Utah. You are encouraged to provide any documentation to support your business’s capability in meeting the requirements. Failure to provide this type of documentation may result in the Government being unable to adequately assess your business’s capabilities to supply MABSM Sustainment and Implementation services. Questions related to this market survey should be addressed to the contact provided below. The question must contain a phone number and email address for responses. Please provide all responses to this survey – to include any questions or comments you might have – to the requiring activity no later than 08 October 2026 to the attention to Hannah Rearick via email: hannah.rearick@us.af.mil or to Nate Littlewood via email: nathanial.littlewood@us.af.mil. Attachments: MABSM_Sustainment_Implementation_RFI | Market Research | 541513 | No Set-Aside | 09/23/2026 | 10/08/2026 | Hill Air Force Base, UT |
Additional Details
Solicitation Number
FA830726RB033
Archive Date
Jul 9, 2026
Office Address
SAN ANTONIO, TX, 78243-7007